Re: Flipping a coin between USO and PH
I'm on the waiting list for the PH as well. I already have the SN3 3.2-17x with all of the trimmings. My rifle is also being set as a switch barrel. I decided to try the PH as a replacement for the SN3 for the following reasons:
Re-zeroing: I already shoot several loads in 1 caliber and re-zeroing the EREK is a PITA. There is no way to get even a rough zero (at the stop) without shooting the rifle. If you know the offsets between two loads, it should be easy to adjust your zero without even firing. I do this all the time with my Quad, switching between .22 LR and .17 HMR and I am at most off by 0.1 mil. Adjusting the EREK is fiddle work and its hard to get it to stop exactly on 0. Its meant to be rock solid for a single load, adjust it once and forget about it. I deal multiple loads now by setting the stop to my lowest zero and then just moving the knob to new zeros or making range cards with offsets. Only one load uses the stop and it isn't the one that really needs it. So, its paying for a feature that I'm not using, but wanted to use.
Tactile feel: I don't like the feel of the clicks on my SN3. They feel kind of mushy IMO as compared to NF or S&B, for example.
Clarity: I've found it to be less clear than the majority of NF and S&B scopes I've seen at the range.
Illumination: inconvenient to get at unless you leave the cap off. I don't like leaving fine thread exposed so I don't do it. Illumination is very useful if you have a fine crosshair that sometimes gets lost on dark backgrounds. The convenience of the PH switch is a big plus.
Magnification: You get more of it for the money with the PH and you have a low range that is still usable by all accounts.
If you can, try and get a look at both of them in person before you purchase. I'm hoping that the PH will solve a lot of the issues I don't like about the SN3. But, I'm keeping the SN3 until I'm satisfied that it does.