For the audiophiles on the Hide, Western Electric is back.

I get that everyone has hobbies that cost money, some more than others. Just saying, if anyone ever identifies that I have spent $125K on a fucking amplifier, just know that I won the lottery, and they guaranteed that Salma Hayek will be sucking my dick every time I hit the power button.

This thing might sound amazing, but the human ear can't possibly distinguish between it and whatever $10K buys.
Respectfully, yes it can. The Western Electrics are really rare and special, the old ones more so than the new. I havent heard this particular one but Ive heard amps that cost more, though $$$ dont necessarily ensure quality of sound. Ive also heard the ones below and to my ear they sound powerful but not nearly as refined as some costing much less. Its largely in marketing to those with more money than sense or good hearing. The total cost of the system I heard them in was something like 1.2 million dollars. LOL.

VAC Statement 452 iQ Musicbloc mono/stereo power amplifier ...​

https://www.stereophile.com › content › vac-statement-...




Apr 18, 2020 — VAC's Statement 452 iQ Musicbloc amplifier ($75,000 for a single amp; $150,000/pair mono, as reviewed) is tall, young, and lovely, but unlike ...
 
If you go tube, go OTL

Futterman OTL-1.jpg


Counterpoint SA4

countersa4.jpg
 
If you go tube, go OTL

View attachment 7590657

Counterpoint SA4

View attachment 7590658
The Futterman and Counterpoint OTL amplifiers haven’t been made in decades and have questionable reliability. Atmasphere and Berning/Linear Tube Audio are well regarded current production OTL. The Berning/Linear Tube Audio uses a unique OTL system that some question whether it really is OTL; no one questions the quality or the sound.
 
The Futterman and Counterpoint OTL amplifiers haven’t been made in decades and have questionable reliability. Atmasphere and Berning/Linear Tube Audio are well regarded current production OTL. The Berning/Linear Tube Audio uses a unique OTL system that some question whether it really is OTL; no one questions the quality or the sound.
I had one of the early Berning/LTA amps in my home system for awhile and wasnt overly impressed. Somewhat bright but it was one of the early efforts. I hear the later stuff is greatly improved. A buddy has a pair of the Atmasphere mono block 60's in his system and they are really nice. Like everything OTL's have their pros and cons.

Ive met Dave Berning a couple times at audio shows, a very unique individual. Its good that hes gotten a reliable company to produce for him as his early amps were good but very unreliable and service a nightmare. You'd call needing a repair and him mom would say "Oh, Dave's in India with his guru." or something similar.

Ralph Karstan, of Atmasphere, who Ive also met, is just the opposite, the consumate professional. A lot of people call on him to repair and modify their gear when no one else can get it running. If I ever replace my push pull 300 B amps Id like to try a pair of his.

One key to the finest sound is using all point to point wiring and leaving out circuit boards and solid state parts. Another is using NOS tubes if you can find them, and for custom builds sourcing old output transformers or spending mega bucks on hand built new ones with grain aligned steel and slow pulled 99.99999% pure copper.
 
Last edited:
The Futterman and Counterpoint OTL amplifiers haven’t been made in decades and have questionable reliability. Atmasphere and Berning/Linear Tube Audio are well regarded current production OTL. The Berning/Linear Tube Audio uses a unique OTL system that some question whether it really is OTL; no one questions the quality or the sound.
I've owned both of the ones mentioned not to mention most other high end electronics. I did a lot of power supply design for most of the companies I have mentioned along with others on a contract basis in the 80s. Had the opportunity to meet both Harvey Rosenberg and Bill Johnson along with Dan D'Agostino of Krell, etc. Used to work for free but got a lot of cool equipment that only the very well heeled could afford. I loved the simplicity of the OTL circuit but it was useless unless the speaker impedance was quite high and capacitive. That is why the Quad ESLs and other electrostatics were a good match. However, I was not a big fan of chamber music and the lack of bass was troubling. I did run Martin Logan monoliths using SA4s for the panels and a solid state Krell to drive the woofer. That was a sweet setup.

None of these animals are what I would call "reliable". When a tube goes, it can be catastrophic. Some of these amplifiers also were a bear to repair as many had point to point wiring. ARC really pioneered "mass production" of tube amplifiers if you could ever call it that. I stopped using large tube amps due to the difficulty of finding matched tubes for reasonable prices. True the Chinese and Russians still make tubes but try to find a matched octet of 6550s for one side of an ARC D250 or matched 6LF6 tubes for an SA-4. You can get them but the costs are really outrageous. Maybe Western Electric's resurgence will change that.

Tube phono stages and preamps were the sweet spot for me. Hook up an ARC 10 preamp to a pair of KRELL mono blocks and connect to any speaker you desire without regard to the impedance. There is nothing like Class A power to drive complex speaker loads. Of course, your source had better be good or you will be disappointed. The source is the first link. Drop the ball there and it really don't matter what you use.

Those were good days but after a lifetime of shooting and other loud pastimes, my ears no longer warrant any gear like this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot
I've owned both of the ones mentioned not to mention most other high end electronics. I did a lot of power supply design for most of the companies I have mentioned along with others on a contract basis in the 80s. Had the opportunity to meet both Harvey Rosenberg and Bill Johnson along with Dan D'Agostino of Krell, etc. Used to work for free but got a lot of cool equipment that only the very well heeled could afford. I loved the simplicity of the OTL circuit but it was useless unless the speaker impedance was quite high and capacitive. That is why the Quad ESLs and other electrostatics were a good match. However, I was not a big fan of chamber music and the lack of bass was troubling. I did run Martin Logan monoliths using SA4s for the panels and a solid state Krell to drive the woofer. That was a sweet setup.

None of these animals are what I would call "reliable". When a tube goes, it can be catastrophic. Some of these amplifiers also were a bear to repair as many had point to point wiring. ARC really pioneered "mass production" of tube amplifiers if you could ever call it that. I stopped using large tube amps due to the difficulty of finding matched tubes for reasonable prices. True the Chinese and Russians still make tubes but try to find a matched octet of 6550s for one side of an ARC D250 or matched 6LF6 tubes for an SA-4. You can get them but the costs are really outrageous. Maybe Western Electric's resurgence will change that.

Tube phono stages and preamps were the sweet spot for me. Hook up an ARC 10 preamp to a pair of KRELL mono blocks and connect to any speaker you desire without regard to the impedance. There is nothing like Class A power to drive complex speaker loads. Of course, your source had better be good or you will be disappointed. The source is the first link. Drop the ball there and it really don't matter what you use.

Those were good days but after a lifetime of shooting and other loud pastimes, my ears no longer warrant any gear like this.
Great post, thanks. The last line is so appropriate form myself as well.

My current system is a 105 db efficient pair of horn speakers driven with a pair of custom built push pull 300 B amps and custom built pre and phono stage, all PtP wired. If its doen right to begin with you'll have no problems.Pre amp and phono stage below.
 

Attachments

  • TTPH6.jpg
    TTPH6.jpg
    82.7 KB · Views: 26
  • TTPRE1.jpg
    TTPRE1.jpg
    81.4 KB · Views: 23
  • TTPH1.jpg
    TTPH1.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 25
  • Like
Reactions: Nik H