To finish first, first you must finish. No argument there.
I've loaded for a fair number of GAP-10s, never had an issue. 6 Creed and 308 mainly. Possible this is an issue from GAP, if it is I'm certain they will take care of it. However, rifle was test fired and functioned from the GAP so find out what that ammo was, get some and see if it rifle functions. If rifle does not function, then clearly something is amiss and it would lead towards GAP needing to do a corrective action. If rifle does function, then you can't blame the 'Vette for stumbling out of the gate when the wrong fuel was put in the tank.
I've built my own custom ARs, we'll keep this to 308 for now, that I geared specifically to run 175 SMKs. Drop dead reliable, system designed to run exact same load as my bolt rifle and it does that w/o tearing up brass. I also found that in that system 155s or lighter are only about 90% reliable, get an occasional failure to function properly. 168 SMK, 175 SMK, 190 SMK the rifle runs like a top. Will rifle cycle every possible 308 round? No, it has some pretty specific boundaries. I expect the GAP-10 does also. I personally wanted to extract every bit of accuracy I could from my AR build, not tear up brass, shoot same/VERY, VERY similar load as my bolt rifle and have 100% reliability within a specific bullet/load range. I get at/below 0.5 MOA on routine basis, brass looks like it came from a bolt rifle, 100% reliability; I met my design criteria. I also control what ammo goes into that rifle. I suspect the reason people buy a GAP-10 is for the very same reasons: extract every bit of possible accuracy, not tear up brass and shoot a very similar load to what they can run from their bolt rifles and get bolt gun like accuracy.
Based on data I've gathered from building 308 ARs to my personal specifications/requirements, not practical to expect a 147 FMJ load to cycle a gas system optimized around a 175 SMK load. I loaded the 147s with a different powder then what is normally going to be found in mil-spec 147 ammo, specifically to see if I could get reliable functioning; I did not get reliable functioning with that 147 ammo. Port pressure, gas volume not matched well. Most 147 FMJ is geared to be compatible with M1A or similar gas system, that is a lower port pressure and gas volume system then what a large frame AR specifically tuned to run 175 SMK ammo is going to want to see for reliable function. What I've seen from factory 308 ARs is that they are geared to run 147 FMJ (Win white box, AE, mil surp) or similar. Feed those rifles 168 / 175 gr match ammo and brass is pretty much one n done as there is a huge burr on case head from rifle extracting under pressure because gas port is too large. Primer pockets get stretched out and half cases won't hold a primer afterwards, if case will will hold primer it is going to leak upon next firing which is going to give you less then stellar accuracy. What the heck, it went bag every time, cycled and shot 1 MOA or so. But, but I can put on an adjustable gas block and fix the problem...yeah, kinda sorta but not really. Played that game with factory 308 ARs before I built a rifle to my specs. Once the port is too large you can make corrective issues but that is never as good as having the port sized correctly in the first place. Okay, that is an opinion on port size and not fact.
OP tried 147 FMJ PMC ammo, has since switched to 175 with better performance but not functional. How dirty is PMC 147 ammo? I've never shot PMC 147 ammo so I really do not have any feel for how clean/dirty that powder used is. How much did the PMC 147 ammo gunk up the gas system, foul port, etc. Maybe GAP needs to specify what they have found to be functional ammo in a GAP-10, provide a known ammo list for end users. Maybe customers needs to let GAP know exactly what ammo they plan to use in the GAP-10 so rifle can be tuned for that ammo.
Does GAP have a 100%, every rifle perfect out of the gate track record? I do not know answer to that but I'd have to say no as mathematically, statistically it is all but an impossibility given that all it takes is a single event to drop you below 100%. George already stated he fixed a GAP-10 that they wanted to run 155 Amax ammo in, so I guess I do know it is not 100% yield rate right out of the gate. I suspect it is in mid to high 90% rate as we are all human and sometimes things slip through the cracks that shouldn't have. I also suspect that GAP fixes stuff that isn't really their fault but cheaper, easier to just fix and carry on.