Gear help - Seeking a 'Rear' Facing Molle Vest

Jayman_10X

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 4, 2009
480
5
48
Central Minnesota
Looking for a molle-type belt carrier where I can clip magazines primarily on a rear-facing vest and sides, but not front. Think of it as a 'backwards' chest carrier. Use is for prairie dog hunting, where we do a fair amount of hiking and mostly shoot prone, hence the preference to not have a traditional chest carrying molle vest. Something like this, except the carriers mounting on one's back. Ideally the front would only have the straps.

thank you!
Capture.JPG
 
Honest question, why not use a backpack? It doesn’t sound like you’ll need to quickly access a mag if you’re ok with having them on your back.

Maybe have a spare mag on your support side in a belt mag carrier if you need a quick second mag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrumpyOleFart
Back pack with molle on the back.

Or take the pack you show and divide the thin nylon straps and attach polymer QD plastic clips commonly used on thin straps, like the ones
shown on the this pack as well. The thin straps will now be on your front chest with the adjustable clips.
IMG_4278 copy.JPG
 
Last edited:
Honest question, why not use a backpack? It doesn’t sound like you’ll need to quickly access a mag if you’re ok with having them on your back.

Maybe have a spare mag on your support side in a belt mag carrier if you need a quick second mag.
Hi PB, Looking for something with quicker access than a backpack. Preference is to reach back and grab a mag without detaching, shifting, unzip pocket, pull mag, get back into position, etc, etc.. Looking for a more fluid solution. And I want to mount at least 8-20 rd mags...
 
Last edited:
Back pack with molle on the back.

Or take the pack you show and divide the thin nylon straps and attach polymer QD plastic clips commonly used on thin straps, like the ones
shown on the this pack as well. The thin straps will now be on your front chest with the adjustable clips.
View attachment 7587278
Thanks Strike, appreciate it. I am pretty ignorant with molle in general, still learning. Looking like I'll go this route...
 
Would this work:


- - - used with - - -


- or -

 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayman_10X
Walk into your local army surplus store and look for LCE's. Or buy a VTAC battle belt and put attachments on the back.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayman_10X
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayman_10X
Hi PB, Looking for something with quicker access than a backpack. Preference is to reach back and grab a mag without detaching, shifting, unzip pocket, pull mag, get back into position, etc, etc.. Looking for a more fluid solution. And I want to mount at least 8-20 rd mags...

Hi,

So, you are wanting to literally reach around yourself and grab a magazine from its' pouch while it is on your back?
Why not just put mag pouches on your belt system? You can damn sure reach the entire belt area better than you can your back area.

Sincerely,
Theis
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayman_10X
Hi,

So, you are wanting to literally reach around yourself and grab a magazine from its' pouch while it is on your back?
Why not just put mag pouches on your belt system? You can damn sure reach the entire belt area better than you can your back area.

Sincerely,
Theis
Agree on the belt, but can only fit so many mags on a belt. Will still wear one of course.
 
Different strokes for diff folks. He wants to lay prone a lot, to each their own.

Hi,

Soo....take backpack off and place in a more expedient and functional position to get direct access to said 8 twenty round magazines.
You ever try to get something out of a backpack while still wearing it laying prone? Much less out of a magazine pouch, lol.

Sincerely,
Theis
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrumpyOleFart
I find that the pockets in my smock are handy.
Laying down, they are all accessible.
Don't have to arse around with pouches.
Though I'm struggling to understand why you need pouches for ammo.
Pretty much in the Camelbak full of gear, and smock only routine for hunting.
Screenshot_20210324-021914_Gallery.jpg
 
Hi,

Soo....take backpack off and place in a more expedient and functional position to get direct access to said 8 twenty round magazines.
You ever try to get something out of a backpack while still wearing it laying prone? Much less out of a magazine pouch, lol.

Sincerely,
Theis
Of course I’ve tried it, I’m a level 7 navy seal samurai that’s trained by the blade. While you went to birthday parties, I did one handed pushdowns. I read sun tzu art of war while watching John wicke in the background. I wear magazine pouches to bed and in a blizzard I can access each pouch with so much efficiency it’s only rivaled by the tolerances of an ai.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: THEIS
I find that the pockets in my smock are handy.
Laying down, they are all accessible.
Don't have to arse around with pouches.
Though I'm struggling to understand why you need pouches for ammo.
Pretty much in the Camelbak full of gear, and smock only routine for hunting.
View attachment 7588928
Why pouches? They are open and close for quick grab. We hunt in the summer when ambient temps are over 90 degrees, so we hunt with light clothing. Not interested hunting with a heavy (or dark) coat with pockets.