I'd really lile to understand how you connect those dots.
Liberal Logic 101: (Doesn't mean you're a liberal, but you are reasoning like one)
(1a) Cop should not have placed himself in front of car which created situation
(1b) Rittenhouse should not have placed himself in Kenosha which create the situation
(2a)Cop instigated by drawing his weapon
(2b)KR instigated by carrying his weapon
(3a) Cop could have jumped out of the way
(3b) Kyle could have retreated
(4a) Lethal force for a non-lethal crime stealing
(4b) Lethal force for a non lethal crime of assault with skateboard and/or being chased (no contact).
Both ignore the "imminent danger" to the shooter. Like it or not, police can detain you for questioning. You don't get to just drive off. You don't have to answer dick, but you don't just get to leave. And while leaving, you don't get to plow over others.
Cop didn't draw his weapon (it appears) until she put car into gear. Also missing from you haters: Cop #2 was trapped by the window (hand). So she can get a pass for that, but the other guy shooting her is bad. She attempts to run down 1 cop, assauts another who has his hand trapped in the door, and she's the victim?
Even San Fran got tired of that bullshit line of reasoning. Where's that put you guys.