So I think I understand the overarching goal of free floating dies. This allows a little wiggle room to compensate for misalignment between the press, shell holder, cartridge and die. Correct?
I’ve seen people use an O ring under the die lock ring on single stage presses. Seems to make sense conceptually. I’m not sure how you could account for repeatable measurements when removing and replacing dies. How much compression is usually applied to the O ring?
Now here is where I’m getting confused; I’m looking at Dillon 550 toolheads and see the Whidden free floating version along with the UniqueTek clam and the locking die rings pinned to the head. In my mind, this seems to be the exact opposite of free floating. The tool head is clamped to The press to prevent movement and the dies are pinned in place. What is actually going on here? Does anyone have first hand experience On the 550 with these pieces improving concentricity etc. ? Thanks in advance for the knowledge.
I’ve seen people use an O ring under the die lock ring on single stage presses. Seems to make sense conceptually. I’m not sure how you could account for repeatable measurements when removing and replacing dies. How much compression is usually applied to the O ring?
Now here is where I’m getting confused; I’m looking at Dillon 550 toolheads and see the Whidden free floating version along with the UniqueTek clam and the locking die rings pinned to the head. In my mind, this seems to be the exact opposite of free floating. The tool head is clamped to The press to prevent movement and the dies are pinned in place. What is actually going on here? Does anyone have first hand experience On the 550 with these pieces improving concentricity etc. ? Thanks in advance for the knowledge.