Help with vortex razor gen 3 1-10

[KineticPerformance]

I know this is an old thread, but does anyone know if the top ranging scale is for an IPSC or an E-Type? The manual says silhouette, which to me means E-Type, but the image is a silhouette. I just picked mine up and I can validate it but prefer the easy ask. Also, what are the chances that the MRAD version gives that range in meters or did they go the easy route and make the scale in yards for both reticles?

 

[Trigger Monkey]

It's scaled for an IPSC target and per the manual it's in hundreds of yards.

 

[KineticPerformance]

It's scaled for an IPSC target and per the manual it's in hundreds of yards.

The manual also says that the subtensions are only correct at max mag in the MoA portion. I also was told the original design was for a 40" target.

 

[TacticalPlinker]

I recommend the MRAD. There's always going to come a time where you decide to play "musical rifles" . It just happens. My Gen3 started out on my KAC 5.56 upper then briefly visited my 6.8 SPC and an 18" T3X in 6.5 Creedmoor for Hog duty.

Having a non specific reticle with dope cards for each load/gun just gives that scope ultimate flexibility.

 

[Terry Cross]

The manual also says that the subtensions are only correct at max mag in the MoA portion.

Is this really in the manual?

It makes no sense at all for this scope.

./

 

[KineticPerformance]

Is this really in the manual?

It makes no sense at all for this scope.

./

 

[TonyTheTiger]

View attachment 7903021

Seems like a bit of an oversight to put that in the manual for a FFP scope.

 

[Trigger Monkey]

Yeah, that's an oversight, the reticle is FFP so it's accurate at any magnification. Also, the ranging bars on the EBR-9 are set up for an 18X30 IPSC per Scott at Vortex.

 

[KineticPerformance]

Yeah, that's an oversight, the reticle is FFP so it's accurate at any magnification. Also, the ranging bars on the EBR-9 are set up for an 18X30 IPSC per Scott at Vortex.

IPSC in yards for both reticles?

 

[Trigger Monkey]

Yeah, why not?

 

[KineticPerformance]

Why should it be? I'm asking because the MoA is Imperial and the MRAD is metric by nature. An IPSC is also metric by nature. It is feasible, maybe even natural, that one might put a metric ranging scale in a metric reticle for people who largely deal in meters.

 

[TonyTheTiger]

Why should it be? I'm asking because the MoA is Imperial and the MRAD is metric by nature. An IPSC is also metric by nature. It is feasible, maybe even natural, that one might put a metric ranging scale in a metric reticle for people who largely deal in meters.

 

[KineticPerformance]

I'm assuming it was born of the SVPS program and the ATACR we got ranges (in meters) shoulder width so that's why I asked. It looks a while lot like the FC DMx but with retard proof rage scale like the T8.