Not my logic...just correcting yours.
I stand by my statement.
This is as dumb a using a pipe wrench on a wood screw. Good to see you are willing to show your ignorance.
You literally didn't answer anything, you've just said you stand by your handily debunked statement.
This is how gaslighting works, is the ignorant piece of shit doing it hopes to wear the victim down into submission. This is what you are doing, you still have not addressed your original statement nor my counter to it.
You said:
"There's no shortage of housing, it's an overabundance of people not wanting to work hard to afford a house they would live in."
I responded:
"I think you have that logic inverted there..."
You responded:
"How so?"
I responded:
"For your statement to be accurate, the homes would have to
not be selling. That is not the case, the homes are selling."
This is the baseline argument. Each side has a position that is articulated. Your position is:
"There's no shortage of housing, it's an overabundance of people not wanting to work hard to afford a house they would live in."
My position is:
"For your statement to be accurate, the homes would have to
not be selling. That is not the case, the homes are selling."
Then you make a straw man, and ignorant, argument that:
"For your statement to be accurate, homes would need to be selling EVERYWHERE......that's not the case."
You are either being disingenuous or you are truly as stupid as your argument, I think it's both.
And here you are, trying to change the argument. Again. A common behavior of abusers. Based on your continued attempt to change the topic from your initial assertion to anything else, I'd say you are just that type of person. The more defensive you get, the more you try to shift the argument.
Or maybe it's partially true, maybe you truly are too stupid to realize that real estate markets are plural -- this thread is
specifically about the plural aspect of the market, and the OP was literally looking to see how other markets are impacted beyond their own....
Regardless, what I see is a weak man made a weak argument and has a weak mind incapable of accepting he was wrong.