Re: How Best to Fix Excessive Neck Runout
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil3</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Since it obvious the expander is causing the runout, I would stop using it (as recommended), but of course the neck is far too small. Somehow, the neck needs to be expanded back up.
- Phil </div></div>
FWIW..........
Simply buy another FL sizer die and designate it as the "sizing only" die, set it up to size per your chamber requirements, and leave the expander/decap stem out of it (you will also need a decap die to do this efficiently/correctly since you won't be decapping during the sizing process). Size your cases through this "sizing only" die, THEN expand your necks with your other die and the floating carbide ball in a seperate step. With your designated "neck expander die" screw the expander stem down more than usual so that the case body cannot contact the inside of the die. Expand your necks by pushing them UP over the floating expander ball instead of dragging the ball through the neck as a die is "normally" used.
You will see a dramatic improvement in runout by reversing the direction that the necks are expanded. Pulling a ball up through does far more damage to runout than pressing the ball towards the case head. The physics involved dictates that the brass can support the strain of neck expanding better if the expansion is done towards the case head. The action is supported by the case head squarely seated on the shell holder, which is squarely seated on the ram, instead of rocking around on the case rim as is the situation with pulling it through. The shell holder is not a precise fit on the ram, on any press, and anything pulling "up" on it will produce movement, which will produce inconsistancy.
I wouldn't ream any necks under normal circumstances but I'd damn sure turn the outside if they were far enough out of whack. When turning you need only skiff off the high side to make the necessary improvement. Unless they are grossly thick necks you won't even touch the thinner half. I've been known to size virgin cases, expand the necks, then turn them to shave off the thick side. New cases usually give me very good accuracy.
Squaring the dies to the press is pretty important. I do all my reloading single stage and setting up a die every time I change to another rifle is a pain in the ass. To fix that I use Hornady locking rings (just my preference because they seem easier to set up square because they pinch the die instead of having only a set screw mashed into the threads) and made a "wrench" that fits them. This "wrench" fits my inch pound torque wrench and my dies get torqued to 200 inch pounds consistantly every time I change them out. This returns them to exactly the same head spacing every time, and helps return them to where they are square.
I also dedicate a shell holder to a specific rifle. Not all shell holders are created equal and even though they may be the "same", or from the same manufacturer, they may vary slightly in height/dimension, and change headspace or other case dimensions, and possibly affect runnout. IOW, my 243AI has it's own dedicated shell holder despite also loading for an '06, 308 win, and 243 win with the same shell holder requirements, they too all have their own. The more consistancy you can employ the better off your ammo will be.
Another way to help maintain good concentricity through the seating process is using the comp seater dies with the spring loaded sleeve, I use Redding. The sleeve in a comp die adds much to it but I also turn my cases 90 degrees 2 or 3 times while seating in small gentle progressions until fully seated.
Of course squarely trimmed/chamfered case mouths are also important, to start with....
This/these methods routinely produce sub MOA ammo for me with not much invested in gear or grief. Quality dies are a must though, and knowing little tricks to fool the physics is a plus......