I've taken a conservative approach to learning the art of building good ammo and early on adopted the practice of working up slowly and never exceeding a published maximum nor assuming that a max load will always be safe in my rifles. I recently picked up a copy of QuickLoad after several years of loading for my .308, 5.56, .45 & 9mm. I've found it to be very useful for predicting where OCW nodes for the rifles are likely to be, but I've noticed that quite a few published loads exceed what it considers maximum pressure by a fair amount. For example, my favorite 77gr. SMK/TAC load that's below Sierra's autoloader max. exceeds QL's recommended max. I'm using measured case capacity and bullet data.
Until now I haven't had anywhere nearby to shoot out past 600 yards, so I've been able to get acceptable performance from relatively mild loads. I've recently gotten access to some wide-open spaces, and I'd like to stretch my rifle's legs a little. The next accuracy node for the loads I'm looking at should be within published limits, but in a few cases will exceed QuickLoad's recommended max. I'd be curious to know how other users fit QL data into the various other sources of information they use to develop their loads.
Until now I haven't had anywhere nearby to shoot out past 600 yards, so I've been able to get acceptable performance from relatively mild loads. I've recently gotten access to some wide-open spaces, and I'd like to stretch my rifle's legs a little. The next accuracy node for the loads I'm looking at should be within published limits, but in a few cases will exceed QuickLoad's recommended max. I'd be curious to know how other users fit QL data into the various other sources of information they use to develop their loads.