Re: How does March compare to S&B?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Team-Send-It!!!</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: problemchild</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 19Scout77</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Shooter McGavin</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well it seems I made the right choice in getting the March scope. It will be used on a light tactical rifle. </div></div>
Talk yourself into whatever you want to believe. You picked a new scope with a non-existent track record in the type of shooting for which you intend to use it over a tried and true market leader. </div></div>
<span style="color: #FF0000">Tried and true that breaks like mad in combat (sb).</span>
Arent the NF's made in Japan?
"I bought a Nightforce 5.5-22X56MM and it arrived today. I was amazed to see "Made in Japan" on the bottom of the tube by the eye piece. I thought they were made in America. Anybody have any info"?
<span style="color: #FF0000">March have a HUGE track record in Bench shooting</span>.</div></div>
I mean no offense but that is a pretty bold statement about one of the best optics made. do you have any statistics or experiences with this personally?
I hate to tell you but benchrest competition is alittle easier on the optics than even a tactical match. You will see alot of s&b's at every match and most guys that don't have one wish they did after using one. </div></div>
Don't be too hard on problemchild, he <span style="font-weight: bold">READ</span> the info on which scopes break or not somewhere in the internet (he said it himself in that thread)... I mean, this is REALLY SOLID data