Awhile ago I did an OCW test across a wide range of charges and eventually settled on the load I have now. Wondering if I didn't miss some pressure signs back then though so looking for another opinion.
When I did the OCW it was pretty cold so I was leaving the ammo inside, then shooting, looking for pressure signs, coming inside and loading up a new magazine, then going back out, shooting, etc. What I missed during that was comparing the appearance of the primers to one that was unfired...
Yesterday I shot a bit and since it was warm (~35) and I wasn't doing load development I took the entire ammo box outside as I normally would. At the end of the day I happened to look at the primers next to some unfired primers and realized that I may have missed some (now fairly obvious) flattening of the primers with the reloads when I was doing my OCW test.
Load is a 77gr SMK in 1x LC 19 brass w/ 24.0gr of N140. The VV app lists 24.7 gr as the max (book = 2657 fps, I got 2772 at 24.6gr). Sierra lists 22.7gr as max (book = 2620 fps, I got 2597 at 22.8gr). These loads at 24.0gr were at 2710 fps when I originally did the OCW test back in November. Rifle is a T3x Lite w/ 22.4" barrel. I am cutting the barrel down to 18" shortly so at that point I'll need to re-evaluate obviously if I lose a bunch of velocity.
From all that I'm interested in opinions on the primer flattening shown below. The left column (single row) was 22gr of N140 with a 75gr ELD-M in LC18 brass. The right 2 rows was 24gr of N140 w/ a 77gr SMK. I'm guessing I should back off a little further to 23.5 gr or so of N140 (I was getting 2642 fps at 23.4gr) but wanted to at least get a second opinion.
Regarding the other marks on the brass I believe those were there. The last time I shot I took a sharpie and marked the brass anywhere it had an indent, ding, scratch, etc. across 10 round to make sure that they were from the original firing (presumably a semi-auto). I was not getting any new ejector or bolt swipe marks from my gun.
When I did the OCW it was pretty cold so I was leaving the ammo inside, then shooting, looking for pressure signs, coming inside and loading up a new magazine, then going back out, shooting, etc. What I missed during that was comparing the appearance of the primers to one that was unfired...
Yesterday I shot a bit and since it was warm (~35) and I wasn't doing load development I took the entire ammo box outside as I normally would. At the end of the day I happened to look at the primers next to some unfired primers and realized that I may have missed some (now fairly obvious) flattening of the primers with the reloads when I was doing my OCW test.
Load is a 77gr SMK in 1x LC 19 brass w/ 24.0gr of N140. The VV app lists 24.7 gr as the max (book = 2657 fps, I got 2772 at 24.6gr). Sierra lists 22.7gr as max (book = 2620 fps, I got 2597 at 22.8gr). These loads at 24.0gr were at 2710 fps when I originally did the OCW test back in November. Rifle is a T3x Lite w/ 22.4" barrel. I am cutting the barrel down to 18" shortly so at that point I'll need to re-evaluate obviously if I lose a bunch of velocity.
From all that I'm interested in opinions on the primer flattening shown below. The left column (single row) was 22gr of N140 with a 75gr ELD-M in LC18 brass. The right 2 rows was 24gr of N140 w/ a 77gr SMK. I'm guessing I should back off a little further to 23.5 gr or so of N140 (I was getting 2642 fps at 23.4gr) but wanted to at least get a second opinion.
Regarding the other marks on the brass I believe those were there. The last time I shot I took a sharpie and marked the brass anywhere it had an indent, ding, scratch, etc. across 10 round to make sure that they were from the original firing (presumably a semi-auto). I was not getting any new ejector or bolt swipe marks from my gun.