Re: How to tell if you need Annealing
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: timelinex</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've never read about annealings effect on accuracy when hand annealing. I was planning on doing it next time I load my 338lm (my first tim eannealing). Am I going to introduce more variation by annealing by hand, rather than just not annealing? Or is the effect not as pronounced as the one poster is making it seem. These rounds are flung 1700+ yards....
As to the original poster.... Instead of throwing them out, why don't you just get a smaller neck bushing. It certainly wont extend brss life like annealing is supposed to, but I can't imagine it being worse than just throwing the brass out. </div></div>
Whether your hand annealing will help or make things worse depends on your technique. Remember when you hand anneal, there are a number of variable that can come into play. The first is how close your flame is to the brass (assuming here already that you have a constant flame size and temperature), the second is where you are pointing with that flame i.e. the neck, the shoulder, somewhere in between and whether you can consistently do this. The last part is how long you are annealing.
I am sure some people can do a decent job just like I know some people can shoot one holers at 100 yards, but for most people, being able to control all three variables time after time is next to impossible. The result is you are annealing different parts of the case differently every time. How much variation there is again depends on your technique.
So if the contention that different degree of annealing causes the brass at the neck and shoulder to be soften to different degrees and this in turn affects how your shoulder bump and neck sizing will turn out and these variables in turn affect neck tension and then MV variability and then your verticals, you can see why it is a reasonable conclusion that how precise you anneal can affect your overall precision in shooting. It is hard to escape this logic.
Of course all this relates to precision shooting at long distances and not plinking at 100 yards. Rounds shot at 1700+ yards of course would be much more sensitive to the variables described above.