Re: I have pudding face!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Win_94</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: landtoy80</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So my conclusion is, If you want to 'break in' a non lapped barrel and you don't have a bore scope, take the rifle to a trained 'break in' gun smith that will shoot, clean, check with bore scope, shoot, clean, check with bore scope over and over again till all the imperfections have been shot out.</div></div>
Why does if have to be that complicated?
You can judge the effect by comparing copper fouling on new a patch compared to an old one. It is that easy.
I cleaned my rifle bore thoroughly for 20 shots. Done.
The barrel copper fouled so much less, the effect of the break-in was undeniable.</div></div>
I guess I'm not sure when an opinion became fact.
You state a very specific measurement that you came up with, but no one is sure how you came up with that number. I want to make it clear that I am absolutley not trying to dog pile you. I think everyone is just curious as to how you came up with those specific measurements? If its your opinion just say its an opinion, but don't represent it as fact.
This discussion has been beat to death on here several times and guys that think it is beneficial to break in a rifle continue to do so. Guys that think its a waste of time don't do it. The two newest rifles I have both have bartlein barrels, both have never been "properly" broken in, neither of them have any sort of copper fouling build up. I run butch's bore shine through the barrel every few hundred rounds and I've yet to have a blue patch.
If I were you I'd just say that it is your opinion and leave it at that, at least before everyone starts thinking you're that know-it-all-jackass at the gun shop that we laugh about when you leave.
Also, there's this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method