That is a good idea. Would need to make sure the target is completely level of course.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Impact to the right at 600 yards plus
- Thread starter uppercut11
- Start date
I came across this video that was pretty good . As many have suggested it is possible that my reticle is canted slightly. I have always just used a level on the receiver and then a level on the top of the turret. I never thought about the top of the turret possibly not being totally level with the reticle but it seems obvious that that could be a source of error. I don't have the tool he uses in the video, but leveling the receiver in a vise and then lining up on a plumb bob should do the same thing as others have suggested. I loaned out my levels though so will need to get back first.
Measured with a chronograph. I have just been using the published BC. It seems to match the drop I am seeing out to 600 yards anyway. Have not shot further. It is not just showing up at 600. It shows to a correspondingly lesser degree at shorter distances as you would expect. I just was using 600 as the example.
Yes, on the same day shot at 100 and was dead center and then at 600 and saw the difference. Saw the same result off of bipod.
Should be able to just do that math in my head.
I static mount all my optics to test tracking - live firing is a poor method. I check plumb with a plumb bob.....I’m also not the OP with the issue, haha. I feel like this thread s really running off the rails, LOL.
That sounds in line with what I am thinking with locking into the gun vice and checking reticle wth a plumb bob. Thanks for all of your input on this thread.
Since we started pulling all students scopes in our PR 1 class, we found a significant number are canted in their rings even a small amount. We see it because we use a level.
we used to only test scopes in PR 2 but now we test in PR 1 and at least 4 out of 12 are canTed in the rings, with another 4 or more canting due to a loose bipod during the shot string .
right handed shooters can’t right and pull right all the time, when you look 90% of new shooters put some noticeable amount of right hand influence into the shot. It’s bigger than any drift.
want to really see how bad you shoot, stop shooting groups at 100 and just try it at 200, I bet your average is 1.5% bigger than expected based off your 100 yard average. Got to 300 it will grow again.
SD is 1% of your elevation, so you need 10 miles to dial or observe .1 the rest is you. The 1 MOA at 1 second is fake, it’s a made up value.
we used to only test scopes in PR 2 but now we test in PR 1 and at least 4 out of 12 are canTed in the rings, with another 4 or more canting due to a loose bipod during the shot string .
right handed shooters can’t right and pull right all the time, when you look 90% of new shooters put some noticeable amount of right hand influence into the shot. It’s bigger than any drift.
want to really see how bad you shoot, stop shooting groups at 100 and just try it at 200, I bet your average is 1.5% bigger than expected based off your 100 yard average. Got to 300 it will grow again.
SD is 1% of your elevation, so you need 10 miles to dial or observe .1 the rest is you. The 1 MOA at 1 second is fake, it’s a made up value.
Thanks. That adds weight to needing to check the cant for sure. In terms of the group size growing, I haven't seen that. I have actually seen slightly smaller group sizes at the longer distances than would be predicted by the 100 yard group for whatever reason.
I may have missed it above, are you dialing the wind at specific distance, or holding in the reticle?
Is you scope FFP of SFP if holding for wind?
You said the miss right scales with distance, which would seem to indicate your not dialing or holding for the wind, holding/dialing the wrong side, or a significant cant at 600 was others have said.
For me a 6mph full value wind is a 0.6mil and hold at 600y, and my scope is FFP so I don't need to worry about what magnification I'm on when holding.
Last edited:
Good question that I wasn't clear on, but I didn't compensate for the wind at all. Was looking to verify drift and just held dead on and then measured amount of drift compared to what was expected.
Ok, bingo, first you need to stop thinking in linear measurements, inches of drift don't matter. You want the angular measurement mil or moa, and the ruler is right in front of you in your reticle.
If you were holding dead center and you measure 0.4mil right, you can go back into your ballistic solver and back that to the full value wind the bullet saw at that distance.
You said elevation was spot on so the MV and BC seem to be calibrated.
Last edited:
So for me, when I am shooting and not sure of the wind, and I hold center, I then use that as the real wind call.
For example if I thought there was no wind, held center at 500y and saw my miss was 1.0 mil right, I could go back into my app and increase the full value wind until I had a 1.0 mil hold. For my rifle that's 6mph full value wind.
Since I know my gun is a 6mph wind gun (lots of threads hear on mph wind method for wind hold), I could quickly see the 1.0 mil miss and know the real wind was 12mph and use this on my other targets.
Hunting is my main application so I just want to make sure I can account for all the drift I am seeing on the first shot. Another thing I need to do is shoot on a perfectly calm day and see what I am seeing for drift. I just haven't had the chance yet.
I'm going to go with a stronger cross wind than where you measured, maybe a valley or wooded area pushes harder between you and the target?
I have no experience but am fair at math. Maybe when you took measurements and shot the wind changed speed?
I have no experience but am fair at math. Maybe when you took measurements and shot the wind changed speed?
Definitely possible, but would be odd that it increased for every shot and decreased on all of the handful of times we measured at points between us and target. It was a wheat field, but there were some rolling hills that could have changed wind currents a bit.
Believe the bullet, if you have the elevation dialed in and your solver is accurately predicting drop, then trust it for the wind. If the bullet moved 0.4mil at 600y that's what it did. If the solver is acurately predicting the elevation drop, it is also accurately predicting the impact of the wind. You have no way to measure the wind all along the path, but you can trust the bullet did and it was a 0.4mil wind for your bullet out of your gun.
No you need to make sure impacrs rise and drop straight up and down..... a string or level will work
As you increase distance the wind affect increases... its not a fixed distance offset....
When you shot at 100 did you then move straight to 600?
Did you shoot between 300 and 500 at all? Where were the impacts?
Did you shoot between 300 and 500 at all? Where were the impacts?
Do you have a source to share for understanding mils? I am trying to wrap my head around it still, but one source said that .1 mil is .36" at 100 yards. This is assuming that the scope adjusts in 1/10th increments. I am just trying to figure this out.
Thank you
Goat
Ryan Cleckner former ArmySniper does a pretty thorough job of explaining mils in this YouTube video.
But if you’re still trying to convert mils to inches and then from inches back to mils you’re missing the real value of your reticle.
Spot your miss, note the number of mils (Using your reticle subtensions) you missed by, adjust your hold by that number, send it.
Yes sir. There's a free version and the pro version. Pro version has most scopes and reticles loaded in the app and most ammo loaded . It updates pretty often to keep up to date. Pretty simple to use. I've had good luck with it.
That is what I do. I take a long piece of newsprint and staple it to a 4x8 piece of wafer board that I have mounted so the 8' is the vertical at 300 yards. I hang a plumb line, make a couple marks, then use a chalk line to snap a line. I draw an aiming point using a compass and color it in with a sharpie. Then I go shoot groups. I shoot a group of 3, then dial some elevation and aim at the same point, shoot another group and repeat until I either run out of target or see a problem. If your scope vertical is not perfectly plumb through the bore, it will show up. It's amazing (to me) just how little off can make such a huge difference at some distance. When I do make a little twist, I first use a 0.5mm lead pencil to make an index mark on scope and usually the rear ring. I use up some ammo but I don't mind shooting.
Charley Robertson of Scorehi in Albuquerque has a good read on how he sets up a scope and he doesn't charge all that much to do so, especially with the current cost of components or loaded ammo.
