Re: IMR 4320 - .223
Yes, you can use it. Visit this website.
http://data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp
Yes, you can use it. Visit this website.
http://data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp
Re: IMR 4320 - .223
Probably because of the large stick size and the small neck. Bridging is a major headache with that combination. The ball powders flow so much better in that configuration. JMHO
Probably because of the large stick size and the small neck. Bridging is a major headache with that combination. The ball powders flow so much better in that configuration. JMHO
Re: IMR 4320 - .223
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: former naval person</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Probably because of the large stick size and the small neck. Bridging is a major headache with that combination. The ball powders flow so much better in that configuration. JMHO </div></div>
Varget is even worse in my eyes.... but everyone loves varget...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: former naval person</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Probably because of the large stick size and the small neck. Bridging is a major headache with that combination. The ball powders flow so much better in that configuration. JMHO </div></div>
Varget is even worse in my eyes.... but everyone loves varget...
Re: IMR 4320 - .223
I guess a lot depends upon the measure. I ran some tests with a Redding, a Lyman, and a Dillon. With 4895 or Varget they all were within +/- .2 gr. With RL 19, the Redding and Lyman were the same but the Dillon would bridge about 3 time out of 5. Interesting, but frustrating.
I guess a lot depends upon the measure. I ran some tests with a Redding, a Lyman, and a Dillon. With 4895 or Varget they all were within +/- .2 gr. With RL 19, the Redding and Lyman were the same but the Dillon would bridge about 3 time out of 5. Interesting, but frustrating.
