Sure thing, but it will have to wait until Monday as I can't access those data sets from where I sit. So I'll have to explain less rigorously, for the moment. To understand inflation you need to take into account purchasing power.
We'll accept that CPI average around 2% for recent history:
View attachment 7731467
Indexed y/y since 1990 CPI looks like this:
View attachment 7731466
Now that we know our capital (i.e. money) is losing 2% of value every year, here’s the obvious follow-up question: how do we prevent that?
To offset the effect of inflation, we need to either 1) earn income on our capital, or 2) grow our capital, at a rate greater than 2% per year to keep pace.
Now here's USD purchasing power indexed over the same period of time
View attachment 7731469
I am sure that folks have already started thinking about their investments (house, stocks, bonds, etc) that have beat CPI by far more than 2%. But have you really beat inflation? Like I said previously, the Fed works hard to keep inflation out of inflation measurements. Does anyone really agree that the price of food is not a VERY important factor to a majority of Americans? But perhaps more importantly, why are financial assets not included in measures of inflation?
While I will later (like later during the week) argue that wages are wayyyy behind inflation, for now I will refer back to the tweet I posted above.
View attachment 7731470
‘Fiat’ just means a currency created by a government. If we break down what a currency is it gets interesting. A $100 US printed note is an IOU from the government. Cash you can hold in your hand is an IOU. Once upon a time these slips of paper were redeemable for gold if you wanted it. Not anymore, obviously.
Stocks, bonds, and real estate. These assets act as a store of value. Many people think they are escaping the (huge) problems of governments creating currency out of thin air and inflation by owning them.
What if the financial assets you have always been taught to buy weren’t what they seemed?
When you say “my house went up by 11% last year” or “my Amazon stocks went up by 25% this year,” did either asset really go up? When you measure whether stocks or real estate went up in price, it depends on what you measure them in.
When we measure how much the overall US stock market went up over the last 30 years we might be impressed. It looks amazing! This is where the painful “buy the vanguard stock market index fund” cliche advice comes from.
What am I measuring the value I create in? What does my value look like when measured with a different metric? Did the price of the assets you own go up, or did the value of the currency you’re using to measure those assets (your purchasing power) go down?
The government and central banks that control money have two magic tricks: 1) Create more money out of thin air. 2) Raise or lower interest rates.
Both of these magic tricks go by several names: quantitative easing, stimulus ($2000 checks of free money), fiscal spending. It’s all bullshit.
Monetary expansion means creating more currency out of thin air. This is a hidden tax on the people who hold that currency.
Currency is created out of thin air for a few reasons: a pandemic (crisis), to fund wars, to help lift a country out of a recession, to give the currency to a bank so they will lend more money to people and businesses.
“Grow cash flows” faster than the printing of money is the last part of the tweet. Some stocks, bonds, and real estate generate cash when you own them. (You knew that already — it’s not rocket science.) If you have an asset generating cash and rising in value over time, then the increase in money created out of thin air matters to you.
Michael says the cash you generate from your assets must be greater than the amount of money created out of thin air (also known as inflation, which simply means prices rising).
Very few people are able to do this.
I'll refer to a more honest index than CPI created by financial advisor Ed Butowsky, called the
Chapwood Index. The Chapwood Index shows that the average inflation over the last 5 years is between 8.1% and 12.9% in the top 10 US cities.
The explanation of the lie that is inflation is articulately nicely on the Chapwood website. Salary and benefit increases are pegged to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which for more than a century has purported to reflect the fluctuation in prices for a typical “basket of goods” in American cities — but which actually hasn’t done that for more than 30 years. As long as pay raises and benefit increases are tied to a false CPI, this trend will continue.