Re: Is shooting chrony F1 the best for the money?
IMHO, "Shooting Chrony" isn't a brand name, it's a warning label. By March I already had gone through two of them ...<span style="font-style: italic">this year.</span> The factory sent me a new one the second time it busted but I had to raise my voice to get them to take any action on it, which soured me on their customer service, so I bought a CED M2 while the SC was on its way back to Canada.
If you check with the online retailers, the Competition Electronics ProChrono Digital gets some ridiculously good reviews. Apparently they don't break. Street price is ~$120, vice ~$200 for the CED.
CED and PACT's model have the advantage in their sensors being 2' apart. Shooting Chrony and Competition Electronics sensors are only 1' apart. If what's under the hood is the same, the error rate should be reduced by 50% on account of their sensors being twice as far apart. My tests of my NIB CED vs my NIB Beta Master confirm that the CED is the more accurate.
Two more advantages of the CED and PACT-style units is that the "brain" sits on the bench next to you instead of attached to the sensors and immediately below the path of the bullet. And if a stray shot happens to hit the all-in-one SC or CE units, the whole thing has to go back to the factory for repair/replacement. With the CED and PACT, the sensors are individually replaceable. Even with one of SC's "Master" units, which has a remote head that sits on the bench with the shooter, there's nothing in the downrange portion of the device that's user replaceable/serviceable.
With those that have a control head, BTW (CED & PACT & SC "Master" units), the control head is connected to the downrange unit by wires. Something to consider if you're shooting at a public range. It's never been a problem for me but I always get antsy when fellow shooters have to cross over my wires.