By recognizing that the question of NATO enlargement is at the center of this war, we understand why U.S. weaponry will not end this war. Only diplomatic efforts can do that.
www.commondreams.org
That is a good summery article.
Remember back in 2014 when "Russia shot down the Malaysia airliner" Remember what was going on. They don't want you to remember there was a full on war going on way back then. And I wonder who was the US pres in 2014.....now who could that have been......and who was the VP, darn my mind is just a blank.
We got told that the russians had to shoot down the airliner, that Ukraine had no means, no equipment to shoot down a plane like that. Oh really? Just how sure are we about that.
Now I don't know for sure, but with this group of folks, I am sure going to question what the "official" story is.
Now why was there shooting going on there in the first place. I did dig into that and I question just who the "bad guys" are.
This entire thing stinks to high heaven, and your article is right, there is no amount of weapons that will allow Ukraine to win this war. I will go a step farther there is no amount of spilled Ukraine blood that can be spilled that will win this war. The only way that Russia may be forced to back off is if blood other then ukrainian is spilled. And the real worry there is they all know it, both east and west. And that will move things in a very bad direction.
Some people need to....ahh....step out of public light and after that, Ukraine has a promise of sovereignty and a promise of remaining neutral. That is the only thing that will bring this to a non bullet riddled end. I think the people of Ukraine would accept that, I think that Russia would accept that, I don't think anyone else will....just like the article pointed out.
