Is the March FX 4.5-28x52 my new ZCO?

[Fret]

Yeah, I don't the particulars on any of this, but the time frame you imply, seems to be about the time when it was realized there was a difference in the MIL measurement and DEON have been using a different one that what people expected. This situation was cleared up about 6-7+ years ago, or more.

https://marchscopes.com/news/12456/

 

[Sako man]

https://marchscopes.com/news/12456/

So, it's likely the optics were tracking true to the March QC but by their standard of a milradian. That is pretty interesting actually. I can imagine it causing a flood of returns or owners thinking their optic didn't track.

 

[Hennig]

If anyone is curious as to form factor, here is the ZCO420 vs the 4.5-28.

 

[W6SPK]

If anyone is curious as to form factor, here is the ZCO420 vs the 4.5-28.

View attachment 8664329

March 4.5-28 and MCS nightstalker, what a great combination!

 

[Hennig]

March 4.5-28 and MCS nightstalker, what a great combination!

Just need a nice light barrel and I’m good to go.

 

[wind gypsy]

Yeah, I don't the particulars on any of this, but the time frame you imply, seems to be about the time when it was realized there was a difference in the MIL measurement and DEON have been using a different one that what people expected. This situation was cleared up about 6-7+ years ago, or more.

I’m aware of the different mil dimensions used. This scope was supposedly after the change and it was off in the opposite direction. Honestly that was the least of my concerns, click error was consistent across adjustment tested so could have been handled within DOPE and/or ballistic calculator.

 

[Denys]

https://marchscopes.com/news/12456/

Right. It was a prototype and even further back than I remembered. There were only a few out in the wild.