Do we?
I'm not the smartest of people but I do understand a thing or two about when people get shot.
Here's the "Magic Bullet shot that went through Kennedy's throat... notice the direction the head moved in the official report...
View attachment 8599984
Kind of makes sense when you understand that a 6.5x52mm Carcano bullet fired from the rear would cause the head to tilt forward since it likely hit at just under 2,000 ft-lbs of energy on an area of the body that essentially "bobs & weaves" because it's attached to the neck exaggerating the impact. But here's the image, close to the torso and Kennedy leaned in the direction of the bullet path. I won't argue that and fully expect 1,800+ ft-lbs with a.. 162gr RN bullet (I think that I remember that accurately).
Let's move on...
Here's the video of the "fatal" shot...
This has been argued for well over 60 years... the direction of his head, attached to the ever flexible neck, went "BACK & TO THE LEFT". Watch it again since you said we all understand ballistics here- which btw was not a qualifying/if anything else it was a "disqualifying" factor in the investigators, but if you hit a plate with any rifle bullet (fight me on this, this should be the smartest community around to discuss this topic), without having any semblance of understanding of physics, tell me just one time that a steel plate was hit and moved "TOWARDS" the bullet path. Remember the bullet impact was high on the skull which would have exaggerated the bullet's trajectory since the neck is so flexible.
The Head would have gone the direction/path of the bullet @ around 2K ft-lbs of force (basic physics and if you dispute that then you either don't understand physics, ballistics, or have been lied to for so long you can't think objectively) Think I'm a liar or a kook? Show me ONE and I mean just ONE video of a steel plate on a hanger to represent a neck (after all if I'm spewing nonsense there isn't a forum in existence better equipped to prove me wrong than SH) where the plate is hit with say... 1,800 ft-lbs of force and the indicator of the hit is that it swings TOWARDS the impact...
Many here do understand ballistics (albeit not many understand physics) but in many ways they're related. If I'm squaring off with a member here- and I were to 'Push' you at the chest level... what direction would you move in? Understand- that the explanation for why JFK's head went "back & to the left" in the Warren Commission's report was because he wore a back brace....
Again- since we understand GSW's here and ballistics... please explain to me how a back brace would cause a shot in the upper/frontal/right lobe per the video would cause the head to move in the opposite direction of the bullet (even with the back brace)? You might argue 'hydraulics'... ok... fill a couple of milk jugs with whatever media you want- water, jetpack, hell jello for all I care- again show me an example where it's hit with a rifle bullet and moves TOWARDS almost 2K ft-lbs of energy being sent at ...
Dollars to doughnuts you can't.
Here's another image from the report... again notice the direction of the head and how it follows the bullet path... But that's not what the video showed. That's not what the ONE and ONLY video showed, and even then the story didn't add up did it (at least not to our physicists and GSW experts here)
View attachment 8599992