When I was starting out with making the break from 300yd max distance to 1000yd max distance, I put a lot of effort into dialing for wind changes. I soon found out that somewhere along the way, I could lose track of my adjustments, and soon after, lose my zero reference. So, I reverted to a 'Dial for come up. make a stab at dialing in a basic wind zero, then resort to hold offs for wind changes" philosophy. I stuck with it, for better or worse. On the balance, it was for the better.
There is the danger of ending up 'chasing the spotter'; altering one's hold off with the marking of each preceding shot. Trust those changes at your peril, and only allow yourself to alter your POA based on trends, and not on individual impacts.
I never really picked up the habit of using a data book because I had acquired a distrust for depending on a specific object, like a notebook, that can be destroyed or lost. Harder to keep it all in the head, but less likely to get destroyed or lost. Besides, the accumulated data builds trends in your thinking that align more correctly with the reality of your experiences. I don't especially recommend this, it's just my own way of dealing with this stuff.
Now that I am in my dotage, that philosophy has developed a few holes, and I write more things down. I think of my memory a being like a fine Swiss cheese, with more holes developing over time. I now like to employ drop/drift charts taped to the rifle's stock, customized for local altitudes and the load's specific ballistics. I also note the load data on each ammunition container. I am considering making up drop/drift charts to include on those containers; but one needs to draw the line somewhere, and I think I'm probably in danger of crossing an important one.
Clear your mind's eye and build the following mental pictures:
Imagine you are rolling a cue ball along a very long pool table. While it's rolling, imagine tipping the table slightly to one side, then the other while the ball is rolling. These tipping upsets affect the ball's path very similar to the way a cross gust affects the bullet's path.
If the crosswind is constant, the deflection becomes cumulative. If it is momentary, and rights itself immediately, the ball continues straight on its new path. If it later tips opposite, the path reapproaches the original heading, but off to the side of that original heading. The earlier the upset, the longer it travels along the resultant heading. with upsets at or near the target influencing the path in the least or to even no degree
In observing, we see that the bullet's path, as seen from above, follows a series of gentle curves while the wind is deflecting it, then straightens on the latest heading when the local wind dies.
Now, imagine that the table is on an elevator. The elevator's motions induce vertical deflection which resemble the effects of updrafts and downdrafts.
Finally, imagine the table is on casters. Moving the table toward the target or toward the shooter demonstrates the effects of headwinds and tailwinds. Remember, the bullet is also accelerating downward under the effect of gravity.
Rotating it demonstrates Coriolis and spin drift. These last two are seldom serious factors except at artillery distances.
All of these degrees of motion apply to the ballistic path and to the overall air mass independently.
Analogies like these can help one mentally visualize the interactions between the ballistic path, the local motions within the air mass, and the overall motions of the air mass as a whole.
But the complexities can become quickly compounded. Reality usually requires the shooter to draw the line at concentrating on the gross effects, and dispensing with the minutia. The shooter who sets out to precisely plot the POI will quickly become overwhelmed. More importantly, the problem's solution will also quickly become invalidated by constantly changing conditions.
This is where the experience comes in, allowing the shooter to develop intuitions. I am talking here about those gut feelings. The more experience you get at shooting in the wind, the better you can trust them.
You can't get them by cherry picking your practice conditions to select only calm ones. They never occur when you need them. The real insights come from when the wind is up.
Shooting groups serves no real purpose in this exercise, because the good ones only come when it's calm, and we can usually only shoot 'for real' when it's not.
I advise my friends who want to shoot better to get Cleckner's
book. I have already handed out four copies..
Greg