Any rhyme or reason to what muzzle devices knights choose to put on their uppers? Does it depend on caliber? I have seen 6.5 uppers with a rare 2 chamber brake suppressor ready device and I have seen their typical 3 prong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Per their rep on an industry forum, they said that the new 2-chamber is meant to improve consistency and accuracy in their large-frame rifles. Evidently their MAMS device would sometimes cause fliers, but in ways really hard to reliably identify or replicate. So instead of spending a ton of time and money diagnosing and fixing it, they just designed the new brake.
The military had significant numbers of rifles with two port suppressor mounts 15 years ago.
Specifically with the 7.62 QDC/PRS suppressor.This.
one of the reasons that KAC carries a premium time is engineering time that goes into each refinement. two port breaks while not anything game changing are something new to Mil type guns and that specific brake needs to be intergrated into their silencer line up as well to ensure that poi is consistent.
So did a number of precision rifles. The two port brake on small arms is not a mystery or a novelty for the military.
The KAC two port is something they would have to test of course.
The two chamber has to be way easier to manufacturer and faster due to lack of weld and the small drills used to make the mams. But you nailed what I was looking for in explanation of why.Per their rep on an industry forum, they said that the new 2-chamber is meant to improve consistency and accuracy in their large-frame rifles. Evidently their MAMS device would sometimes cause fliers, but in ways really hard to reliably identify or replicate. So instead of spending a ton of time and money diagnosing and fixing it, they just designed the new brake.
Per their rep on an industry forum, they said that the new 2-chamber is meant to improve consistency and accuracy in their large-frame rifles. Evidently their MAMS device would sometimes cause fliers, but in ways really hard to reliably identify or replicate. So instead of spending a ton of time and money diagnosing and fixing it, they just designed the new brake.
I would assume if they get more contracts for that caliber they will expand the line. I would assume the 6.5 suppressor will be next. In about 5 years if the 6mm ARC continues to impress that could be the next sr-15 caliber.So the MAMS was the TITTIES when it came to recoil reduction BUT the motherfucker sprayed bullets. Couldn't be rectified and I guess KAC never figured it out. I guess I'm lucky I didn't push 'em on that brake! The flash hider QDC mount, the cage style, works fine.
Don't they make 6.5 specific stuff now?
I hadnt heard that where is this infoARC uses a Grendel bolt, they already tested and weren’t satisfied with the results per Jack Leuba.
Somewhere in KAC's ARF industry forum.I hadnt heard that where is this info