Trying to get some feelers out here, maybe I can get some pictures of your setups.
I'm trying to get a general consensus of what is the considered the maximum objective size and magnification for a small frame AR versus what is symmetrical for the size and weight.
Before I get hit with the Sponge Bob meme and "UsE ThE RiGhT ToOl For the JoB", slow your roll keyboard commando. I understand, and acknowledge that. If you have ever had a piece of kit that by the specs was the "right tool for the job" , but in practice was probably the worst choice due to size and weight considerations... You understand where I am at here, I'm looking for others experiences.
My setup in question is a 20 inch 6 ARC, looking at putting a 4-20 x 50mm scope on it. I don't want it banging into everything, and don't want to have Hubble attached to the top of my rail either.
Typical engagement is going to be from 50-750. Yes... you can shoot 1k at 8-10 power, doesn't mean I don't want PID at what I may be shooting at those ranges.
Any help is appreciated, stay safe.
I'm trying to get a general consensus of what is the considered the maximum objective size and magnification for a small frame AR versus what is symmetrical for the size and weight.
Before I get hit with the Sponge Bob meme and "UsE ThE RiGhT ToOl For the JoB", slow your roll keyboard commando. I understand, and acknowledge that. If you have ever had a piece of kit that by the specs was the "right tool for the job" , but in practice was probably the worst choice due to size and weight considerations... You understand where I am at here, I'm looking for others experiences.
My setup in question is a 20 inch 6 ARC, looking at putting a 4-20 x 50mm scope on it. I don't want it banging into everything, and don't want to have Hubble attached to the top of my rail either.
Typical engagement is going to be from 50-750. Yes... you can shoot 1k at 8-10 power, doesn't mean I don't want PID at what I may be shooting at those ranges.
Any help is appreciated, stay safe.