Lawsuit being prepared against DD. Thank Big Green for this……..

[Haney]

Texas school shooting victims take action against gunmaker — Reuters

The father of a 10-year-old girl slain in the Uvalde, Texas, school shooting and a school employee have taken initial steps that could lead to lawsuits against Daniel Defense, the maker of the semiautomatic rifle used in last week's massacre that killed 21 people.

apple.news

while not a precedent, it emboldens them. Fuck you Remington and your garbage ass guns.

Remington's fault , quite the imagination. Fucking idiotic really .

 

[JbBooks]

We also have the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005.

Peaceful protestors torch and loot entire neighborhoods without consequence, the Clintons have knocked off more people than Ted Bundy and NY just passed laws this week that piss all over the second amendment.

The law is selectively enforced and subject to the whims of the politicians and their puppets in the courts.

Overturn that BS.

How dare you group Ted Bundy in with the Clinton’s, he was only a sociopathic serial killer, nothin near as evil as the Clintons.

 

[Short-bus]

How come folks are suing the firearms makers, but they don't sue an alcoholics drink of choice when they consume too much and kill a person on their way home. Why aren't they suing the car manufactures in any and all fatal accidents? The guy that drove his car through the Christmas parade, why aren't they suing the manufacture of that SUV?

Fucking clown world we're living in at the moment.

Branden

 

[clcustom1911]

Supreme Court ruled that police have no obligation to enter. I believe that was after the stoneman Douglass shooting in ft lauderdale when the school SRO stayed outside

Yup. That pussy was fired for dereliction of duty, then reinstated.

 

[Vodoun daVinci]

How come folks are suing the firearms makers, but they don't sue an alcoholics drink of choice when they consume too much and kill a person on their way home. Why aren't they suing the car manufactures in any and all fatal accidents? The guy that drove his car through the Christmas parade, why aren't they suing the manufacture of that SUV?

Fucking clown world we're living in at the moment.

Branden

Pretty sure when they get the guns and it doesn't solve The Problem they will go after all the other stuff that can be dangerous.

VooDoo

 

[E. Bryant]

I don’t even see how any of their advertisements apply. That IG post isn’t an ad. It’s a social media post.

There's no real distinction nowadays. Heck, even a random Tweet by an employee could be construed as an statement of company policy.

Expect a lot of ass-covering by various firearms companies in the near future.

 

[pmclaine]

Stop,
Don't touch,
Leave the area,
Tell an adult.


This is how you check that the chamber is empty,

Never point it at anything you do not wish to shoot, don't be a Baldwin.

edit to add: The Eddie Eagle refrain also works when they find bad shit on social media. Our school district is all over getting the students to tell a responsible adult about questionable social media goings on.

When I wore a pistol for a living and my kids were young it was their fascination.

Immediately I told them anytime they are curious about it they could ask me, I would make it safe and they could hold it.

Each asked to do this 2 maybe 3 times....curiosity satisfied they never asked about it again.

Making firearms a mystery, or something taboo, is the problem.

 

[_Windrider_]

When I wore a pistol for a living and my kids were young it was their fascination.

Immediately I told them anytime they are curious about it they could ask me, I would make it safe and they could hold it.

Each asked to do this 2 maybe 3 times....curiosity satisfied they never asked about it again.

Making firearms a mystery, or something taboo, is the problem.

Yes. It’s part of the problem for sure.

 

[BuildingConceptsllc]

When I wore a pistol for a living and my kids were young it was their fascination.

Immediately I told them anytime they are curious about it they could ask me, I would make it safe and they could hold it.

Each asked to do this 2 maybe 3 times....curiosity satisfied they never asked about it again.

Making firearms a mystery, or something taboo, is the problem.

Exactly what my dad did, and what I do with my boys. When they ask to see the guns, I say sure... and then we have another great opportunity to go over how we handle all guns.

We are all going to have to make tough choices and stand up to this or we will lose it all. We will have to sacrifice big things for what we believe in, period.

 

[mi223]

Supreme Court ruled that police have no obligation to enter. I believe that was after the stoneman Douglass shooting in ft lauderdale when the school SRO stayed outside

That part right there just burns my ass. Great you have no obligation to go in. I am fine with that. Then get the fuck out of my way because if my kids in that school I am going in(i believe most decent, able body people would do the same). I am probably not the best suited guy to handle that situation but I sure as fuck wouldn't sit and listen to the screaming. But when you are held back by cowards with guns that is when there the problem starts.

 

[supercorndogs]

View attachment 7884352
From what I understand, this is where they’re focusing on. This as been circulating around twitter and certain news organizations. They say it’s marketing to children. Unfortunately DD may have a hard row to hoe ahead. I’m sure most of us understand this is far from the problem. My kids were raised around guns from a early age and learned to respect them, but hey, can’t let a crisis go to waist now can we.

Pretty easy argument that add targets dads.

 

[HousePlant]

We'll see what DD's advertisements are like and if it puts them in a corner.

But I would like to see Coke and Pepsi sued into the toilet for selling sugar water causing so many medical issues in this country. They advertise to children, teens, young adults, etc. and they all are sicker because of it. So... when is that going to happen?

Also, what's to say this pile of shit that did this in Uvalde didn't just get "sold Daniel Defence" by the guy in the gun shop and had no idea about them? Is there some evidence that he was influenced by a social media advertisement?

 

[HousePlant]

That would hurt them more in the long run. This probably goes the way of Remington that the insurance company settles. I wonder if it will have a different effect of insurance companies dropping gun manufacturers as clients or raising the premium cost to something astronomical (which will get passed onto us).

That's the goal. Make guns so expensive nobody can buy them anymore except... you guessed it... the rich.

 

[OkieMike]

Exactly what my dad did, and what I do with my boys. When they ask to see the guns, I say sure... and then we have another great opportunity to go over how we handle all guns.

We are all going to have to make tough choices and stand up to this or we will lose it all. We will have to sacrifice big things for what we believe in, period.

Well said

A firearm is a tool. And like any tool, it can be dangerous if misused or used carelessly.

Had a similar conversation with my brother-in-law a few years back. We were cutting firewood and he had my 10 year old nephew out there running the chainsaw...

I fully admit I questioned the practice.

B-i-L shrugged his shoulders and responded... "How old does he have to be before a chainsaw quits being dangerous?"

Drove that point home like a sledgehammer.

We used to apprentice young men at 11 years old... And they were competent journeyman by 18.

Our youth is when our brains are most receptive to learning. Use that time to give a kid several years of experience before he becomes an adult.

Mike

 

[Jsp556]

And people trash LMT for shipping firearms with a semi-auto cut carrier.

 

[JR_77]

Supreme Court ruled that police have no obligation to enter. I believe that was after the stoneman Douglass shooting in ft lauderdale when the school SRO stayed outside

Was discussing this topic with my kids and we looked it up. Here are the details on the landmark case and the second case ruling.

The original landmark case is DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services.
The landmark case was reaffirmed by Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS) in
Castle Rock v. Gonzales.

“The Court went on to reaffirm the DeShaney ruling that there is no affirmative right to aid by the government or the police found in the U.S. Constitution, and thus no legal recourse could be brought thereunder. [16] The “no duty to protect” rule remains unwavering and the law today.”

 

[Greasly]

The Court went on to reaffirm the DeShaney ruling that there is no affirmative right to aid by the government or the police found in the U.S. Constitution, and thus no legal recourse could be brought thereunder. [16] The “no duty to protect” rule remains unwavering and the law today.”

Should be part of every firearms advertising campaign. Essentially, you're on your own.