I like it and think they did a good job. Little less cluttered with the way the numbers are done. Just not a fan of the upside down triangles is all.
Has anyone found definitive practical use/application for the chevrons? I don't think I'd ever use them, just trying to get smarter on the best application and how they're used for leading and ranging movers. Only information I was able to find (below), which wasn't much. I was an early adopter and I don't recall getting a separate manual for the reticle when I purchased the scope.
https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/leupolds-cch-reticle/
I can't seem to find good hi-res images of the CCH reticle, but from what I can see, it looks great. Has anyone compared it to a H59? Thoughts?
I'm running the Mark 5HD 3.6-18x CCH on my MWS, which replaced an S&B PMII 4-16x H37. Hindsight being 20/20 I probably should've kept the S&B, but I was able to offload it for a decent amount, picked up the Mark 5HD and pocketed a lot of the extra cash in the exchange. The Mark 5HD offered advantages over the S&B such as being more compact, lightweight, etc. Never used the illumination to light up the H37, and while the Mark 5HD didn't resolve quite as well as the S&B at distance, it comes close enough and still gets the job done. There is a lot to like about the Leupold's CCH reticle, especially given the wind calls we were getting from our spotter during DRCC, who tended to call out corrections in quarter .mil increments. Initially I wasn't sure how I would feel about it being graduated in .25 mil hashes considering I'm used to seeing grid reticles with .2 hash marks. Nevertheless, I have grown to appreciate the open center at each .25 mil hash and I think I really would've benefited from this optic during the long range portion of the training (was running a 1-8x ATACR). I've contemplated selling it and replacing it with an H59 reticle since I would like to streamline all my reticles across all my current and future scopes (MPVOs/HPVOs), but for some reason I just can't bring myself to part ways with this scope featuring this reticle. I will say that the lines are very thin and I suppose it
could get lost in a heavily wooded/shaded backdrop, but I haven't been hindered by that for my uses. In this case it would be nice if Leupold did offer illumination for this reticle in this particular model. Besides that, if I do find a limitation that I can't get over then I might entertain swapping it out for a Mark 5HD H59 or a NF 4-16x H59. It really is a great scope and reticle combo overall.