I’m looking for a high end piece of glass going on a Weatherby MK V Euromark in 270 wby. I’ve been looking into these 2 scopes specifically which has the better glass pros and cons of both? The Z6 is priced higher but I can get a used Z6 for around the same price as the Leupold
I have both Z8i 1-8 and VX6HD 1-6 scopes. I think the Leupold glass is brighter, side by side, in daylight, at 1 power. The illuminated circle dot reticle on the Swaro is preferable to the Leupold dot, as the Swaro allows both dot and circle-dot. The power adjustment ring on the Swaro is easier to turn as provided than the Leupold with the lever attached. The Swaro sighting adjustment is simpler and preferable to that of the Leupold. The Swaro is somewhat heavier. If I were choosing between a Swaro Z6i and a Leupold VX6HD, I'd probably go with the Leupold, on cost. But, I do prefer the Z8i. A 1 power level with the circle-dot illuminated is about the best for close fast work. Having the 8 power capability is for me a significant upgrade over the Leuopold's 6, one that doesn't leave me wanting more magnification for my uses. I do want more than 6.
I think the Swaro Z8i 1-8 is the best hunting riflescope I've ever seen or used. That said, for half the price, you can't lose with the Leupold. All of this said, the "feel" of the Swaro is perfect, better than the Leupold; it feels like you could drive nails with it. Despite advertising, I don't think either gives a true 1 power. I've never seen or used a comparable Zeiss, Kahles. I think both Leupold and Swaro give good value for the money.
Try to find a dealer who'll work with you on price - this may be a riflemaker. I've had $500 off the Swaro, $400 off the Leupold.
I'm also very pleased with my Swaro Z8i 1.7-13.6 x 42. It also has the illuminated circle-dot reticle. It's on Dad's Mark V 300 Weatherby, custom from the shop back in 1964. What a wonderful combination! Makes me smile just thinking about it!