Rifle Scopes Light weight hunting scope?

BIGHAPPY

Private
Minuteman
Dec 30, 2010
12
0
51
Hello,

I've pretty much have been a lurker over the last few years here on the Hide. I enjoy searching SH and picking-up what I can here and there. But with this question though, I think all I've done is confuse myself with the search button. Thats why I'm turning to you guy's for a little help.

Like my title says, I'm looking for a hunting scope that is around 20 ounces. I also would like to keep the length to 13 or less inches. Good tracking is a must! Low light conditions will be encountered, so scope/reticle must be up to the task. Capped vs exposed turrets doesn't matter to me, nor does ffp or sfp, as long as the reticle can handle low light conditions.

What is making this hard for me, is I don't have access to handle many of the scopes that I am considering. So I really don't have anyway to judge for myself. Because of this, I sure hope you guys will help me out and point me in the right direction.

This is going on a standard weight deer/antelope rifle. With shots up to 600 yards expected, as we have a place to pactice to that range. Here's the kicker, I only have $650 or less to spend, as I still have 6 years of school to get through. Because of the school thing, I have to get this right the first time, as I don't have the funds to sell the scope, and start over. Any info on these scopes would be greatly appreciated!

The scopes I'm looking at are:
Bushnell Elite Tacticle 2.5-15x42 17oz 13"
Leupold MK 4 4.5-14 LR/t 16oz 12"
Viper HS 4-16x44 LR 20oz 13"
Viper PST 4-16 22oz 13"
Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x44 20oz 14"

I can get the Bushnell, Leuplold, and Zeiss at cost, though a friends dad. Which puts them in my price range. That said, I really like Vortex, as the Viper I picked-up two years ago rocks! More then likely, the PST is out of my price range but the HS is right there. Anyway, sorry for the long post and thanks for any info that someone can pass a long.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

For hunting applications I don't think that you can get better glass than Swarovski. In their Z3 line they have a 3x10x42, 12.6" long and weighs 12.7 oz., 4x12x50 is 13.78 and 14.5oz.
In higher magnification the z5 3.5x18x44 is 14.3" long and 15.9 oz.
Pricey but you'll never be disappointed.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Leupold 2.5X8X36 w/ B&C reticle. Just range, then point an shoot from muzzle to 500-700yds depending bullet an speed. Twisting knobs and worrying about scope tracking, is old school. Do check the reticle sub-tension though.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

SWFA 3-9x42, search for LL review of it. Great little scope, You'll pay double to get anything close to it.

Rath
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Swarovski this thing is light great RET and amazing glass.

<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/E4DVrScm-AM"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/E4DVrScm-AM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>

Mike @ CST
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Thanks for the replys everyone!

Very nice video CSTACTICal! I'm sure the Swarovski is a great scope, but it's a little out of my price range at $900. I just can't pull that off, at this time in my life.

A lot of you, seem to be saying to go with one of the ballistic reticles vs dialing. But wouldn't just dialing be more versatle? Or am I missing something?

Thanks again!
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

In a hunting situation you will likely not have time to dial come-up. Also most hunting scopes don't have exposed turrets.

Forgoing "tactical" features lets you get more for your money in the way of glass (both quality and/or magnification or zoom range).
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Dialing is realistic in a hunting situation if it's a long ways off and you know your drops but otherwise I think a holdover reticle is better.

Zeiss Conquest w/target knob are nice scopes and very versatile. Haven't seen a Z3 (I'm sure it's nice) but if you can't afford then you can't afford it.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Just got back from looking at a few scopes today. The Zeiss was one of them, and clearly its a nice scope. Based on what I've seen today and the recommendations on here. The Conquest is looking like the best fit for my needs.

Still going to look around and try to find the Bushnell, so I can check it out first hand. Pretty much down to those two scopes. Not that I don't like the others, as I do. Just with me being able to get the Bushnell and Zeiss at cost, really helps this broke college student out.

One last question. For those that have used the Zeiss, do you find that the z-plex reticle is a little to "busy" or is it not really an issue?
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

I suggest a ballistic reticle only if you've settled on a particular load and know that your rifle likes it. Otherwise, a tactical scope with exposed turrents (that match the reticle, such as moa-moa or mil-mil) can work well in hunting applications.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NextGen</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

One last question. For those that have used the Zeiss, do you find that the z-plex reticle is a little to "busy" or is it not really an issue?

</div></div>

I would say the z-plex is about the least busy reticle you can get besides a fine crosshair or on the zeisss a #8 or german #4 reticles. Are you reffering to the rapid z reticles? Those are a little busy, especially the rapid z1000. The others aren't too bad.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Ya, it was the z reticles that I was referring to. My bad! The one I looked through, was the z1000. Just seemed a little much for my liking.
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gunfighter14e2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Leupold 2.5X8X36 w/ B&C reticle. Just range, then point an shoot from muzzle to 500-700yds depending bullet an speed. Twisting knobs and worrying about scope tracking, is old school. Do check the reticle sub-tension though.</div></div>

Good advice!
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

One thing to bare in mind is that a fine reticle disappears in low light.. I am a big fan of a German #4 or a well done lit reticle

I think given your budget you would be hard pressed to find an all around hunting scope than an Accupoint 3-9x40 with green dot and mildot

with most calibers you can run a 200 yard zero and use the dot from point blank out to say 250, or hold a little high out to 300 yards..

Past that you can use the mil dots for holdovers with decent light

You have to spend a lot more money to get a better all around hunting scope
 
Re: Light weight hunting scope?

Just wanted to say, that I had a chance to handle the Swarovski z3 today. It's still out of my price range, but the glass in this thing is unreal! I really like the Conquest's glass, but I could sure tell a difference between the two.

The reticle that this z3 had, was similar to the Conquest's rapid Z reticle. The z3's was a little bigger and seemed like I could get on targets a little faster, than what I could with the Conquest. Of coarse, I'm sure that would probably very per person. The z3 seemed to have a constant eye relief at all powers.

Just wanted to pass it a long.