Sharing my results from today’s range time. This is only a sample of 1 and more testing needs to be done.
Product link (no affiliation, no sponsorship):
https://limbsaver.com/products/sharpshooter-x-ring-barrel-dampener
As you are probably aware, my experience with the Savage B22 Precision (B22P) has been a mixed bag.
For the price, the MDT chassis, 1.5 lb Accutrigger and 18”threaded barrel appeared to check all the boxes for a base class NRL22 build. However, the non supported cartridge feeding resulting in scratched bullet driving bands and frequent stuck fired casings left much to be desired.
I had intended to do a side by side test with the CZ457 Pro Varmint (CZ 457) but I assessed that the difference in the scope magnification and bipod would outweigh the difference of shooting on a different day. After breaking in the CZ457 and being satisfied with the results of my 6x5 @50 yards with a .360” average, I got the itch to break in and test the B22P. Previously, the B22P would shoot SK Flatnose Match, SK Std+, Lapua Biathlon Extreme and CCI SV no better than .75” for 5 shots @50 yards.
The weather today was a chilly 40F with 41% humidity, winds were 10-11MPH from 12 o’clock with shifts to 10-11 o’clock. The groups were shot prone with a bipod and rear bag. To give the B22P the best opportunity, I transferred the Atlas CAL bipod and Athlon Argos BTR gen2 6-24x50 over from the CZ457 to the B22P. The B22P barrel is a 18” threaded barrel with a .800“ diameter.
After shooting 250 rounds of bulk ammo, I switch to shooting 50 yard groups. I started with the Fiocchi SV and worked the barrel tuner down from the barrel to thread protector junction after shooting a 5 shot group approximately 1/2” closer to the chamber. The results showed gradual improvement in group size and pattern, but I ran out of the Fiocchi SV. So I switched to the CCI SV and shot 10 shots to season the barrel and shot the following groups.
My unofficial B22P 6x5 with the Limbsaver X-ring at 2.5” from the muzzle was .739” with best group of .551”
I did try 2 groups at 100 yards with the following results (I don’t know where the 5th shot went on the 1st group):
Here is the rifle set-up:
Observations:
1. Even bundled up and shooting off a padded mat, 40F and 10 MPH in gray overcast weather feels cold fast.
2. Low sample experience: The Limbsaver X-ring shifts in 1/2“ increments showed gradual improvement in the size and shape of the groups.
3. Low sample experience: The unofficial 6x5 group of .739” and best .551” was the most precise this rifle has shot the CCI SV in less than ideal weather conditions.
4. Opinion: I felt that the higher magnification scope and Atlas CAL bipod made a difference in my groups.
5. Opinion: If previous experience holds, higher quality ammo such as the SK RM and Lapua CenterX may shoot tighter groups (SK Std+ previously shot better than the CCI SV). More testing coming as weather, time and ammo selection dictates.
6. Opinion: The Limbsaver may work better with thinner longer barrels vs. a bull barrel. The .800” B22P barrel might be able to squeeze a bit more precision out of the Limbsaver with some ammo and position tuning.
7. Opinion: The Limbsaver is ugly, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Beauty may be defined by how much you appreciate form over function. The ugly stick isn’t so bad since the cost was low ($11), easily removable, and could even be beautiful if it can win matches.
Happy to answer any questions or clarify as needed.
YMMV, happy shooting
Product link (no affiliation, no sponsorship):
https://limbsaver.com/products/sharpshooter-x-ring-barrel-dampener
As you are probably aware, my experience with the Savage B22 Precision (B22P) has been a mixed bag.
For the price, the MDT chassis, 1.5 lb Accutrigger and 18”threaded barrel appeared to check all the boxes for a base class NRL22 build. However, the non supported cartridge feeding resulting in scratched bullet driving bands and frequent stuck fired casings left much to be desired.
I had intended to do a side by side test with the CZ457 Pro Varmint (CZ 457) but I assessed that the difference in the scope magnification and bipod would outweigh the difference of shooting on a different day. After breaking in the CZ457 and being satisfied with the results of my 6x5 @50 yards with a .360” average, I got the itch to break in and test the B22P. Previously, the B22P would shoot SK Flatnose Match, SK Std+, Lapua Biathlon Extreme and CCI SV no better than .75” for 5 shots @50 yards.
The weather today was a chilly 40F with 41% humidity, winds were 10-11MPH from 12 o’clock with shifts to 10-11 o’clock. The groups were shot prone with a bipod and rear bag. To give the B22P the best opportunity, I transferred the Atlas CAL bipod and Athlon Argos BTR gen2 6-24x50 over from the CZ457 to the B22P. The B22P barrel is a 18” threaded barrel with a .800“ diameter.
After shooting 250 rounds of bulk ammo, I switch to shooting 50 yard groups. I started with the Fiocchi SV and worked the barrel tuner down from the barrel to thread protector junction after shooting a 5 shot group approximately 1/2” closer to the chamber. The results showed gradual improvement in group size and pattern, but I ran out of the Fiocchi SV. So I switched to the CCI SV and shot 10 shots to season the barrel and shot the following groups.
My unofficial B22P 6x5 with the Limbsaver X-ring at 2.5” from the muzzle was .739” with best group of .551”
I did try 2 groups at 100 yards with the following results (I don’t know where the 5th shot went on the 1st group):
Here is the rifle set-up:
Observations:
1. Even bundled up and shooting off a padded mat, 40F and 10 MPH in gray overcast weather feels cold fast.
2. Low sample experience: The Limbsaver X-ring shifts in 1/2“ increments showed gradual improvement in the size and shape of the groups.
3. Low sample experience: The unofficial 6x5 group of .739” and best .551” was the most precise this rifle has shot the CCI SV in less than ideal weather conditions.
4. Opinion: I felt that the higher magnification scope and Atlas CAL bipod made a difference in my groups.
5. Opinion: If previous experience holds, higher quality ammo such as the SK RM and Lapua CenterX may shoot tighter groups (SK Std+ previously shot better than the CCI SV). More testing coming as weather, time and ammo selection dictates.
6. Opinion: The Limbsaver may work better with thinner longer barrels vs. a bull barrel. The .800” B22P barrel might be able to squeeze a bit more precision out of the Limbsaver with some ammo and position tuning.
7. Opinion: The Limbsaver is ugly, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Beauty may be defined by how much you appreciate form over function. The ugly stick isn’t so bad since the cost was low ($11), easily removable, and could even be beautiful if it can win matches.
Happy to answer any questions or clarify as needed.
YMMV, happy shooting
Attachments
Last edited: