Re: LMT or LWRC?
I think a lot of the negativity surrounding the REPR revolves around the "P"(recison) aspect of the rifle and expectations thereof. It seems like people who buy them expect extreme accuracy due to this "P" in the name and when they don't achieve it, they're let down. This of course is understandable. But from the feedback that I received from actual owners (I did a lot of PM'ing to those that own/shoot them for my personal research), the overwhelming response I got was that those who own them, love them dearly. True, there was a known issue concerning P-mags not working properly in the initial batch, but LWRC seems to have remedied that particular malady. And while they may not be the most accurate AR 308 of the bunch (though I've heard reports of 1/2 MOA accuracy), they do seem very robust and eat all kinds of ammo well. At least according to what's been reported to me. So as a precision rig, maybe, maybe not. But as a Battle Rifle they seem to be in the running in terms of overall performance. If only they weren't so damn pricey. Again, I must disclose that I've never handled/fired one, so take my opinion as that,...an opinion.
On the other hand, what's not to like about the MWS? It has all the boxes checked. And the fact that LMT has a history with KAC, is like the cherry on top (unless you dislike KAC)