The average Harvard grad today detests the values of the Bible, and probably couldn't name most of the major characters in that book.
The same could be said for a Fordham University and Wharton School of Business grad.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn moreThe average Harvard grad today detests the values of the Bible, and probably couldn't name most of the major characters in that book.
Damn another internet tough guy. Quit hoarding all the tin foil you weirdo
Places change, and their people along with them. The founders would have been kicked out of the Ivy league had they been in it for the past 10 years. Just like JFK would have been kicked out of the Democrat party if he were to revisit it over the past 10 years. A person at Harvard in the early years of this nation would not only have been a scholar of the bible, but spoke it in biblical Hebrew. The average Harvard grad today detests the values of the Bible, and probably couldn't name most of the major characters in that book.
Places change, and their people along with them. The founders would have been kicked out of the Ivy league had they been in it for the past 10 years. Just like JFK would have been kicked out of the Democrat party if he were to revisit it over the past 10 years. A person at Harvard in the early years of this nation would not only have been a scholar of the bible, but spoke it in biblical Hebrew. The average Harvard grad today detests the values of the Bible, and probably couldn't name most of the major characters in that book.
first of all, i voted for trump and of course wished he had won. and if there is fraud to the extent that it made him lose, then i hope that is brought to light and he is ruled the victor.No one is gonna spoon feed you the answers. The machine manipulation is a complicated subject. The obvious fraud is obvious, and you need only look at the actions being taken by the courts and other .gov types, as well as the endless supply of testimonies, to get a decent picture of how it all went down.
first of all, i voted for trump and of course wished he had won. and if there is fraud to the extent that it made him lose, then i hope that is brought to light and he is ruled the victor.
the problem is that the answers NEED to be spoon fed. you don't win in court just by saying there was massive fraud. you win by presenting actual evidence, actual transactions, etc. pretty sure if trump or anyone else had actual material evidence he'd be spouting that actual evidence on twitter etc and not just generically claiming 'massive fraud.'
Can you show me where this alleged election is actually happened regarding voting for president?Election is over. Move on.
I recon that is why they are trying to get their day in court. Going public with evidence before then can cause multiple problems.
I think the distribution platform(s) might be an issue.....first of all, i voted for trump and of course wished he had won. and if there is fraud to the extent that it made him lose, then i hope that is brought to light and he is ruled the victor.
the problem is that the answers NEED to be spoon fed. you don't win in court just by saying there was massive fraud. you win by presenting actual evidence, actual transactions, etc. pretty sure if trump or anyone else had actual material evidence he'd be spouting that actual evidence on twitter etc and not just generically claiming 'massive fraud.'
If President Trumps team has the evidence in hand, then it would be a hedge against the court systems corruption. Go through the process, and if denied proper redress, THEN present it to the public.Who has the proof of mass fraud? The election precincts. Trump goes to court claiming fraud. Brings data supporting and stacks of affidavits affirming fraud. Courts say there's no proof; go away. He cannot get the hard proof if the cases are thrown out. The people that committed the fraud aren't just going to hand it over without court orders.
I hope for the best, but realize if we're thinking the courts / legal system will do their job, we haven't been paying attention. It's all corrupted to the core. If anyone knows of a way to straiten that out that doesn't look like 1861, let's hear it. Otherwise...
There were more total votes cast.
If President Trumps team has the evidence in hand, then it would be a hedge against the court systems corruption. Go through the process, and if denied proper redress, THEN present it to the public.
People much smarter than I have been calling (worrying) about this mob-rule shit for centuries. Most notably, de Tocqueville, who talked about Tyranny of the Majority in his Democracy in America.
Democracies were thought vulnerable to majority tyranny in two distinct forms. Firstly, tyranny that operates through the formal procedures of government. Tocqueville drew attention to this scenario, wherein “politically speaking, the people have a right to do anything”.
Alternatively, the majority might exercise moral or social tyranny through the power of public opinion and custom. Tocqueville lamented this new form of “democratic despotism”. He was concerned about the potential abandonment of rationality if a claim to rule is based upon numbers, and “not upon rightness or excellence”.
It's amazing that men like him and others in those days called themselves Liberals. Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill both strongly railed for individual liberty, separation of powers and limits on government. "Liberals" today are straight up Communists.
You are too black and white.
Fox reports today that Trump says he will run for again next time meaning he expects defeat
Which is why I believe he has what he needs to charge right through this whole process.If they dont have the evidence in hand they are fucking stupid and he will be going to jail.
Is this still available?so if there is evidence that the election was stolen, and it goes to the SC, and they rule in favor of trump......that is bad for legitimacy?
a legal ruling based on evidence is bad for legitimacy?
so its much better to have an illegitimate govt for the sake of "legitimacy"...?
are you seriously fucking retarded?
i really dont know why you are such a dick hopper for "public opinion".....the public is retarded......you can have video evidence of joe biden groping children.....but so long as the media goes "no he wasnt groping her, he was just giving her a 'strong embrace' " they will believe it.....
hell, biden is on video claiming he has the most "extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in history"......and the media literally came out and said "oooooh no, thats not what he really meant".......and people just forgot about it.
who ya gonna believe, me or your lying eyes.
jesus just look at all the riots from police shootings.....a cop is not charged when he shoots an armed man trying to kill them.....and the "court of public opinion" riots and burns down cities.......should we send innocent cops to prison to appease the mob?.......fuck there is video evidence proving their innocence, and they still riot.
Faux reports today that Trump says he will run for again next time meaning he expects defeat
Which is why I believe he has what he needs to charge right through this whole process.
This may have been posted elsewhere, but I found this poll data fascinating:
View attachment 7489462
20-30% of DEMOCRATS think it is very likely the election wasn't fair and/or setup to favor biden.
first of all, i voted for trump and of course wished he had won. and if there is fraud to the extent that it made him lose, then i hope that is brought to light and he is ruled the victor.
the problem is that the answers NEED to be spoon fed. you don't win in court just by saying there was massive fraud. you win by presenting actual evidence, actual transactions, etc. pretty sure if trump or anyone else had actual material evidence he'd be spouting that actual evidence on twitter etc and not just generically claiming 'massive fraud.'
Who has the proof of mass fraud? The election precincts. Trump goes to court claiming fraud. Brings data supporting and stacks of affidavits affirming fraud. Courts say there's no proof; go away. He cannot get the hard proof if the cases are thrown out. The people that committed the fraud aren't just going to hand it over without court orders.
I hope for the best, but realize if we're thinking the courts / legal system will do their job, we haven't been paying attention. It's all corrupted to the core. If anyone knows of a way to straiten that out that doesn't look like 1861, let's hear it. Otherwise...
Here's some fun for the afternoon...
the SC will never remove a sitting president EVER regardless how fraudulent, its just not going to happen
Never say Never!
by june trump is on twitter everyday and no one is going to listen, its happening already the news left and right are not covering him as much
Are you surprised? have you listened to the Project Veritas tapes? Its a concerted effort of the Media. The Media acting as a propaganda arm of the communists should piss us off as much as the election fuckery.
wait until hes not president anymore, youll never see him again
72 million people disagree.
Some may say "oh that's just 2 votes. What's the big deal?"
2 out of 100.... A 2% fraud.... and Trump "lost" by.. 1.5% or so in AZ?
Idk... math and shit.
0.3%, good buddy! 2% fraud removed gives Trump 51% of the vote.
That was the intended result the whole time......have Trump lose by a small percent.
They didnt count on Trumps big turnout and it fucked up the algorithm causing them to resort to having to create the ballots to match the results.
They couldnt point to Bidens 5 trailer loads of votes and say "Winner!" as they sat parked next to Trumps 10 trailer loads.
I agree with the premise, but the substance is a bit off from what I understand.
In states with actual ballots you need to:
1.) Manipulate the vote to give your guy the win
2.) Back that win up with ballots
3.) Not get caught
3 obviously didn't happen, but 1 and 2 were going to have to play out one way or another, hence the very awkward pause in counting, and one that ostensibly was a result of a water leak. (Spoiler alert: Sidney Powell has security camera footage of that night in GA, and there was no water leak, and some brave souls stayed behind after everyone else was skedaddled, who kept counting fucking ballots til 1AM)
I would argue that, if anything, they were actually pretty well prepared for Trump's actual turnout. They had plenty of ballots this time. Last time, not so much.
It was one of those, "I don't fucking care what you have to do, fucking do it!" moments, for sure.Well Dominion has the capability to print ballots from the PDF according to what is out there.
There certainly was an "Oh shit!" moment.
On Fox Business Neil Cavuto was down like someone had shot his puppy at 1030 in the evening....he was sad the pre election polls were wrong as evidenced by Trumps big leads in must win Biden states......
No doubt that they saw the machines of the communist (Dominion, ES&S, etc, etc) could not make up the difference and then injected Plan B into the loop but were overzealous and put in an step function of votes instead of sliding them in here and there which would have been at the noise level. There is ZERO doubt this election is on the cusp of being stolen, not from republicants, but We the People!!!!Well Dominion has the capability to print ballots from the PDF according to what is out there.
There certainly was an "Oh shit!" moment.
On Fox Business Neil Cavuto was down like someone had shot his puppy at 1030 in the evening....he was sad the pre election polls were wrong as evidenced by Trumps big leads in must win Biden states......
Expecting we would be going to bed about 2300 or so (remember we work) the intent was we would go to bed seeing Biden leading by a thin margin or Trump winning by a thin margin.
That way on waking in the morning there would be no shock.
Waking up seeing 10% leads eliminated was shocking.
and to the vote count curve.....resulted in vote dumping spikes they had hoped to avoid.
I don’t math guud.0.3%, good buddy! 2% fraud reversed gives Trump 51% of the vote.
Or, at the very least, drops Biden down by 2% or so.
Barr is swamp, I've been saying it for over a year. He drug his feet, played the "It takes time to put a case together" ruse and ran out the clock managing to not indict anyone in a field where everyone is criminal openly committing felonies and acts of treason.Not doing your job is the same as doing the work of the Communists.
Failure to act, when its your duty to do so, in the face of wrong makes you as guilty as those committing the crime.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.Barr is swamp, I've been saying it for over a year. He drug his feet, played the "It takes time to put a case together" tactic and ran out the clock managing to not indict anyone in a field where everyone is criminal openly committing felonies and acts of treason.
He put the DOJ to sleep and occupied a position that could have otherwise been filled by a real, productive AG.
And thats just what his fellow deep state globalists told him to do.
Constitution is not dependent on popular legitimacy...The latter statement is incorrect. The Divine Right claim was what made the crown legitimate to uneducated masses who had been subjugated and ruled by religion for centuries.
As to the other, I agree that the foundations of the Constitution are classical, with a good dose of Enlightenment, but the truth remains that, like the King's right, the ability of the constitution to remain the law of the land is dependent on its popular legitimacy. Without that it becomes meaningless, no matter how exquisite a document it might be. Like it or not, there is sometimes a balancing act in maintaining its power.
Here's hoping you are right!!! And yes you are def right about the press... Amazing and sickening the slant they put on some stuff.This is happening. In PA. In AZ, Tomorrow in NV.
The information/evidence hasn't been given to the media on purpose. They have proven to be enemies of our Republic and cannot be trusted to use the information correctly. They twist everything to fit the communist agenda. Just look at how they misquoted Barr. Just because your not seeing it on CNN/MSNBC/FAUX/ABC/CBS/NBC does not mean it's not happening. This is a battle for our Republic, and you don't give the enemy your battle plans. They (the media) will find out when we find out... and even then, they will twist the story to make it sound like Trump cheated and stole the election from Biden.
Watch the full video linked to facebook
It's in the last half of the video he lays out the gauntlet.
Do you speak Hebrew when you talk about the Bible?"Ivy" league guy here. I break your above generalization if it makes you feel better.
The whole idea of constitutional government is that it depends on the consent of the governed. It literally depends on popular legitimacy. What exactly has happened to civic education in this country. It's like the second line of the Declaration of Independence. "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."Constitution is not dependent on popular legitimacy...
All the constitution needs is young men to take a oath and old men to honor their oath.
For the love of God don't breed.The whole idea of constitutional government is that it depends on the consent of the governed. It literally depends on popular legitimacy. What exactly has happened to civic education in this country. It's like the second line of the Declaration of Independence. "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
Do you speak Hebrew when you talk about the Bible?
The average Harvard grad today detests the values of the Bible, and probably couldn't name most of the major characters in that book.