LPVO opinions

Jigstick

Jigstick

“What’s the matter colonel sanders….chicken?”
Full Member
Minuteman
    • Jul 21, 2017
    2,308
    3,076
    Pittsburgh PA
    #1
    I have a new build finishing up. A 14.5 midlength built on a Radian ADAC lower, San Tan upper, Lancer carbon fiber handguard, and Vltor A5 system. Pic for attention:

    5CF1D9D9-DB14-4ECD-9B0F-42D5568D6742.jpeg


    I’m wanting to run a LPVO and 45* offset RMR on this setup. So far the rifle is pretty dam light weight.

    my buddy has a Khales LPVO on his rig and while very nice it’s out of my price range. So I’m looking at the following:

    NF NX8 with the tight eyebox issue

    Vortex Razor 1-10

    and Primary Arms Platinum 1-8 ACSS Raptor

    I’m really digging everything about this Primary Arms optic except it’s heavy as fuck. Does anyone have hands on experience with this optics I’m looking at?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Dvlray6
    #3
    The eye boxes will get tight on all of them once they get past the 6x on the upper end magnification range. It all depends on how tight is acceptable to you though.
     
    #11
    The Primary arms Platinum one you are looking at is a solid choice for the budget range.
    It has good glass and the controls work well.
    It is heavy but it's solid.
    The off setting between each illumination setting is a nice touch.

    The Biggest thing to recommend it is that it's one of the few LPVO options that has a reticle which is actually usable at 1x without illumination for quick shots.

    The Razor Gen III 1-10 has better glass and would be a better choice if you were trying to do precision range work.

    However, the Razor would be a fair bit slower to get on target at 1x without illumination, especially if it was not super bright outside or the target area was shaded.

    Basically if you want something that you can actually walk around with and be able to pull up and take snap shots with and not have to worry about illumination being on or off, the Primary Arms Platinum is a good match.

    The Illumination ranges from 2 Night Vision settings to Noon Day stand out bright.
    Yet you can still use it without illumination very easily all the way from 1x to 8x

    One of the guys from Primary Arms is on the forum here.
     
    #12
    I have “Precision” built ARs. ARs more designed for DMR style engagements. I also have a hard use SBR 10.5. What I’ve been lacking is a carbine purpose built for “fighting”...if you want to call it that. Something to run hard in carbine courses. Something to defend the ranch with. That’s the purpose of this gun. Something I can grab at a moments notice and be equipped to handle close in to medium range targets quickly. Both during daylight and under Nods/thermal with a Dbal or Peq
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Glassaholic
    #13
    I don't think the tight eyebox on the NX8 is really a thing if you mount the gun the same way each time. Sure, if you are shooting lying down under a car the eyebox will be brutal, but it will be on other LPVOs too. I do think it has too much x at 1x, but for what it is, as super light LPVO, it is tits.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1911hombre, Hoax001, WillHugh and 1 other person
    #14
    choid

    for that exact scenario is why I plan on putting the RMR on a 45* offset. I really really dig the reticle in the Primary Arms Raptor. But dam is that NF lite
     
    #15
    This is even lighter, ILya seems to like it for what it is, and if you're doing the offset RMR anyway...

    www.swfa.com

    SWFA 2.5-10x32 SS Ultralight Riflescope

    SWFA 2.5-10x32 SS Ultralight Riflescope Details SKU: SSUL2510X32BDC Finish: Matte Reticle: MSR 556 BDC Tube Diameter (in): 1 Elevation Knob: Low Profile Capped (1/4 MOA) Windage Knob: Low Profile Capped (1/4 MOA) Parallax Setting: Fixed Focal Plane: Second
    www.swfa.com www.swfa.com
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Tripl3play and gnochi
    #16
    I've only had an ATACR 1-8 and now my Razor Gen 2(E) 1-6. I really tried to like the ATACR, ran it a few times at the local range and at a 2-day course. Just wasn't for me. Going to the SFP Razor, I'm much happier. More eye relief and a better eyebox. At 1x it's almost as good as just a red dot. I run that in a scalarworks mount, and have an offset DPP in an Arisaka offset mount. Arisaka also makes the interface plate for a bunch of other RDSs, including the RMR. They also have a feature unique to them(I believe) Where the base under the interface plate can be swapped around, so the RDS can be mounted either 45 or 35 degrees away from the picatinny rail. Best offset RDS offset mount I've found to date. Your preferences may prove this inaccurate. SICK handguard, BTW.
     
    #17
    Slevin182 said:
    I've only had an ATACR 1-8 and now my Razor Gen 2(E) 1-6. I really tried to like the ATACR, ran it a few times at the local range and at a 2-day course. Just wasn't for me. Going to the SFP Razor, I'm much happier. More eye relief and a better eyebox. At 1x it's almost as good as just a red dot. I run that in a scalarworks mount, and have an offset DPP in an Arisaka offset mount. Arisaka also makes the interface plate for a bunch of other RDSs, including the RMR. They also have a feature unique to them(I believe) Where the base under the interface plate can be swapped around, so the RDS can be mounted either 45 or 35 degrees away from the picatinny rail. Best offset RDS offset mount I've found to date. Your preferences may prove this inaccurate. SICK handguard, BTW.
    Click to expand...
    Just want to clarify you had the "ATACR" 1-8 and not the "NX8" 1-8? Reason I ask is most feedback on ATACR 1-8 is that it has a very good eyebox whereas the NX8 is the one more finicky.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jigstick
    #18
    Anyone have feedback on the Athlon Cronus 1-6? Seems like it stacks up well in terms of weight against the Razor gen II-E 1-6, so I'm wondering how it is on glass quality. Whenever people post pics of the Razor I'm impressed by the clarity.
     
    #20
    FWIW, I have PA platinum Griffin and it’s badass. Glass seems as good as NF to me. I haven’t spent a lot of time comparing both side by side but have used both. I prefer the Griffin ACSS reticle though.
     
    #21
    Razor 1-10x, hands-down. Only time I'd choose an NX8 over it would be a very substantial price difference (like $400-$500). Vortex really knocked it out of the park with the Gen3.
     
    #23
    I'm running an NX8 on a 14.5 and love it. There's no LPVO that's perfect at everything due to constraints of the mag range, so decide what's most important to you (weight, footprint, reticle, edge to edge clarity, eyebox, etc.).

    The NX8 is light and compact, so handling wise it feels close to a red dot to me, whereas with other optics it's obvious I'm swinging a big scope around. Eye box is a little tight, but if you set it up with proper eye relief shouldn't be a problem at all, especially if you're planning to run an offset dot for close up. Reticle is nice as well - fat center dot and super bright so works well at 1X, cross hairs below are thin enough for shooting at distance.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Hoax001 and Jigstick
    #24
    wjm308 said:
    This is even lighter, ILya seems to like it for what it is, and if you're doing the offset RMR anyway...

    www.swfa.com

    SWFA 2.5-10x32 SS Ultralight Riflescope

    SWFA 2.5-10x32 SS Ultralight Riflescope Details SKU: SSUL2510X32BDC Finish: Matte Reticle: MSR 556 BDC Tube Diameter (in): 1 Elevation Knob: Low Profile Capped (1/4 MOA) Windage Knob: Low Profile Capped (1/4 MOA) Parallax Setting: Fixed Focal Plane: Second
    www.swfa.com www.swfa.com
    Click to expand...
    Hmm. I wonder how the glass compares to the Razor LH 1.5-8x32? It would save me 4 more ounces on my .300 blk hunting build.

    To answer your question on the red dot/LPVO, I run a Delta Point Pro piggy backed on top of my LPVO (not at 45) and I have been ecstatic with the setup for about a year now. I thought when I put it up top, it would be used sparingly in use/competitions and that the LPVO would still see the bulk of the work. Bottom line, red dots are still faster and easier, especially at extreme angles and offsets. When transitioning with a LPVO from target to target you can still easily get shadowing at the edges of your scope, something you won't see on your red dot. Turns out, my LPVO stays on about 3x+ and my DPP gets pretty much all the work inside 50y and still the majority of the work all the way out to 100.

    Yes, if someone made a 30mm lightweight FFP 2.5-10 to run with my DPP, I would not need an LPVO. But it doesn't exist.
    IMG_20200802_091820.jpg
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jgunner, Tripl3play and Jigstick
    #26
    Burdy said:
    Hmm. I wonder how the glass compares to the Razor LH 1.5-8x32? It would save me 4 more ounces on my .300 blk hunting build.

    To answer your question on the red dot/LPVO, I run a Delta Point Pro piggy backed on top of my LPVO (not at 45) and I have been ecstatic with the setup for about a year now. I thought when I put it up top, it would be used sparingly in use/competitions and that the LPVO would still see the bulk of the work. Bottom line, red dots are still faster and easier, especially at extreme angles and offsets. When transitioning with a LPVO from target to target you can still easily get shadowing at the edges of your scope, something you won't see on your red dot. Turns out, my LPVO stays on about 3x+ and my DPP gets pretty much all the work inside 50y and still the majority of the work all the way out to 100.

    Yes, if someone made a 30mm lightweight FFP 2.5-10 to run with my DPP, I would not need an LPVO. But it doesn't exist.
    Click to expand...
    Thank you Burdy. I've been seriously considering the DPP piggy backed similar to your setup with my Bushnell LRHSi on my SPR rig. You're right, they just don't make a "lightweight" FFP low magnification optic, in fact, I can't find any that crack the 20oz barrier. Not sure what it is about FFP designs that create such a huge bump in weight, I'm guessing @koshkin could probably help answer that along with help answer how the SWFA Ultralight glass compares to Razor, based on price point my guess is it wouldn't compare but it also sounds like it is pretty good.

    Looking at your setup below, two questions, which scope mount are you using for the DPP and what is that bronze looking thing on top of the rail on your handguard?

    1608682299690.png
     
    #27
    wjm308 said:
    Thank you Burdy. I've been seriously considering the DPP piggy backed similar to your setup with my Bushnell LRHSi on my SPR rig. You're right, they just don't make a "lightweight" FFP low magnification optic, in fact, I can't find any that crack the 20oz barrier. Not sure what it is about FFP designs that create such a huge bump in weight, I'm guessing @koshkin could probably help answer that along with help answer how the SWFA Ultralight glass compares to Razor, based on price point my guess is it wouldn't compare but it also sounds like it is pretty good.

    Looking at your setup below, two questions, which scope mount are you using for the DPP and what is that bronze looking thing on top of the rail on your handguard?

    View attachment 7509266
    Click to expand...
    Kahles K18i is the optic. The object you drew the rectangle around are the bipod legs that insert into the barricade stop. The entire system is 3.5 ounces. Heathen Systems.
     
    #28
    wjm308 said:
    Just want to clarify you had the "ATACR" 1-8 and not the "NX8" 1-8? Reason I ask is most feedback on ATACR 1-8 is that it has a very good eyebox whereas the NX8 is the one more finicky.
    Click to expand...

    Correct. Never used the NX8 1-8, only the ATACR. The eyebox was good, from what I've read as good as it gets for a FFP LPVO. Going to the Razor was a big difference though. I'm happy with it and I wasn't with the ATACR. YMMV
     
    #29
    wjm308 said:
    Thank you Burdy. I've been seriously considering the DPP piggy backed similar to your setup with my Bushnell LRHSi on my SPR rig. You're right, they just don't make a "lightweight" FFP low magnification optic, in fact, I can't find any that crack the 20oz barrier. Not sure what it is about FFP designs that create such a huge bump in weight, I'm guessing @koshkin could probably help answer that along with help answer how the SWFA Ultralight glass compares to Razor, based on price point my guess is it wouldn't compare but it also sounds like it is pretty good.

    Looking at your setup below, two questions, which scope mount are you using for the DPP and what is that bronze looking thing on top of the rail on your handguard?

    View attachment 7509266
    Click to expand...

    The new March 1-10 Shorty DFP is 17.6oz, and the Athlon Ares ETR 1-10 FFP is 19.2oz.

    That said you can’t actually buy either of them just get, but that is on track to change in the next few months.
     
    #30
    WillHugh said:
    I'm running an NX8 on a 14.5 and love it. There's no LPVO that's perfect at everything due to constraints of the mag range, so decide what's most important to you (weight, footprint, reticle, edge to edge clarity, eyebox, etc.).

    The NX8 is light and compact, so handling wise it feels close to a red dot to me, whereas with other optics it's obvious I'm swinging a big scope around. Eye box is a little tight, but if you set it up with proper eye relief shouldn't be a problem at all, especially if you're planning to run an offset dot for close up. Reticle is nice as well - fat center dot and super bright so works well at 1X, cross hairs below are thin enough for shooting at distance.
    Click to expand...
    Agreed. You are always going to be compromising at some point. If a small lightweight footprint is what you are looking for then the NX8 1-8 is the way to go. On 1x you are basically running a red dot and its very bright. The eye box is the only real downside to the NX8 from my experience with it. I had to play around with my stock set-up, but once I did it worked fine. If it had the wind dot reticle like the ATACR it would be near perfect.
     
    Last edited:
    #31
    gnochi said:
    The new March 1-10 Shorty DFP is 17.6oz, and the Athlon Ares ETR 1-10 FFP is 19.2oz.

    That said you can’t actually buy either of them just get, but that is on track to change in the next few months.
    Click to expand...
    Not LPVO's, I know those dip below 20oz, I'm thinking 2-10's, 2-12's with 36 - 42mm objectives.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FishinGuns and gnochi
    #32
    Burdy said:
    Kahles K18i is the optic. The object you drew the rectangle around are the bipod legs that insert into the barricade stop. The entire system is 3.5 ounces. Heathen Systems.
    Click to expand...
    Sorry, I meant the scope tube mount that the DPP is bolted to on the scope. I see now with the bipod legs on the barricade stop, you have the wrap holding the legs, that is an interesting light weight setup... when it comes to AR stuff I am a bit behind the times and find myself playing catchup.
     
    #33
    The March looks like the titties, I wish they did a mil/vet discount. That 1-8x is literally the size of a prismatic.

    I'll probably go with the ATACR but the Mk8 could be in the running if it's better than the ATACR, it's slightly more expensive --my problem is I can't exactly check either out first. I'll need advice.

    I do have a USO 1-8x, one of the older ones, and it's one of the most all around useful scopes I have.

    I think I'd like a micro aimpoint alongside the 4-16 ATACR or Mk6 on a Mk20 rifle but not so sure I'd put one on a 1-8x. But I tend to keep it at 4x most of the time and I can make that work at any distance.

    Army apparently thought the Sig Tango6T was the way to go... 1-6x, SFP --I'd hate to have to teach SDM's on that goddamn thing. Not that there's anything wrong with SFP it's just teaching shooting math on an ACOG was hard enough in four weeks and they're doing it in two.
     
    #37
    wjm308 said:
    Sorry, I meant the scope tube mount that the DPP is bolted to on the scope. I see now with the bipod legs on the barricade stop, you have the wrap holding the legs, that is an interesting light weight setup... when it comes to AR stuff I am a bit behind the times and find myself playing catchup.
    Click to expand...
    My bad, the DPP mount is Reptilia
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Glassaholic
    #40
    Burdy said:
    March needs some tree reticles.
    Click to expand...
    Do you mean for the LPVO like the 1-8 and 1-10 - I agree, took them a while to get a good tree reticle but finally got the FML-TR1 and FML-PDK for their 5-42 and 4.5-28 scopes that I believe will slowly propagate down to the other (long range) scopes. But I'd like to see a very nice mil tree similar to ATACR and Gen III as well as a nice BDC.
     
    #41
    wjm308 said:
    Do you mean for the LPVO like the 1-8 and 1-10 - I agree, took them a while to get a good tree reticle but finally got the FML-TR1 and FML-PDK for their 5-42 and 4.5-28 scopes that I believe will slowly propagate down to the other (long range) scopes. But I'd like to see a very nice mil tree similar to ATACR and Gen III as well as a nice BDC.
    Click to expand...
    Yes, any LPVO over 4 power should have some wind holds. The vast majority of use is with 55-62g 5.56 and just 5 mph of wind at 600 yards can be an issue. They are designed to be fast and course, no one is touching the windage on a LPVO.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Glassaholic
    #42
    Burdy said:
    Yes, any LPVO over 4 power should have some wind holds. The vast majority of use is with 55-62g 5.56 and just 5 mph of wind at 600 yards can be an issue. They are designed to be fast and course, no one is touching the windage on a LPVO.
    Click to expand...
    Do you have a "favorite" tree reticle for LPVO, or have some suggested enhancements for one you really admire, but is "not quite there"?
     
    #45
    wjm308 said:
    Do you have a "favorite" tree reticle for LPVO, or have some suggested enhancements for one you really admire, but is "not quite there"?
    Click to expand...
    From all I have run the one that would be easiest to get 99% there would be the Kahles 3GR reticle. Add half mil elevation ticks, number the whole Mils on the elevation or at least every other whole mil, and extend from 7 mils down to 10 at it would be done. If only one change could be made, I would pick numbering the mils, nothing is more frustrating under pressure than counting.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Glassaholic
    #47
    Jackalope said:
    This must stem from guys that have shot red dots forever. It really isn’t an issue.
    Click to expand...
    Somehow every single attribute of any optic on Snipershide is deemed highly significant except for eyeboxes on LPVO's. I haven't figured that out yet. Literally, the number one attribute a good LPVO needs is a roomy eye box yet it gets dismissed here time and time again. No other weapon platform save for handguns will have a higher degree of off axis shots taken or time sensitive shots without a consistent cheek weld, yet people still say it's a non issue. I wonder why more people are married to their LPVO purchases than their precision optics? Such a strange phenomenon. A tight eyebox on a LPVO should be an immediate non-starter if you plan on using that optic in any type of dynamic environment, period.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: rfrye, SepticDeath, Poorboyr and 2 others
    #50
    Jackalope said:
    If the majority of your shots are off axis, time sensitive and you can’t get a consistent cheek weld, you shouldn’t run a magnified optic.
    Click to expand...
    Well, the LPVO is loved for its versatility in a variety of situations, both CQB and at distance. The tradeoff in running an LPVO with a forgiving eye box for dynamic CQB situations are far less than the tradeoffs of making consistent hits with a red dot at 600 yards. Of course, if you know you will only be doing one or the other, then obviously you should pick the best tool for the job.
    If you look at two of the most popular LPVO's run in theater by SF, the Razor 1-6 and Kahles K16i, both have fundamental flaws that other LPVO's address, but both have one thing in common, incredible eye boxes.
    If I know I am going to do nothing but CQB, of course, I am grabbing my EOTech. If I have no idea what I will be facing, the LPVO will be the wisest choice.
    I've also found that the LPVO is useful for things other than just making hits. PID and/or searching for targets is something that is pretty difficult to perform with a red dot and I find the LPVO is almost invaluable in this regard.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jimichanga, HD1911 and gnochi
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Similar threads

    J
    Rifle Scopes Best High-Magnification LPVO for my use case?
    Replies
    57
    Views
    3K
    Burdy
    Burdy
    10ring'r
    Rifle Scopes Another LPVO Question/Answer/Battle Post
    Replies
    2
    Views
    689
    10ring'r
    10ring'r
    G
    LPVO Decision
    Replies
    5
    Views
    1K
    Hoody2shoes
    H
    P
    SOLD LWRC IC-A5 12.7" upper and optic
    Replies
    3
    Views
    854
    pinkhair
    P
    D
    Brightest LPVO 1-8x Under $700
    Replies
    25
    Views
    6K
    taboopineapple
    T
    Top Bottom
    Back
    Home
    Forums
    Merch
    Alerts