Re: LSU vs Alabama Rematch
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mike</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JCH</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why should you be eligible to win a National Championship if you didn't win your conference championship?</div></div>
Because the bottom line is it's all about the dollar and it doesn't matter who wins what or how they do it (within reason), they're going to put two teams in the NC that are going to bring in the most money, plain and simple. </div></div>
I agree 100%.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rammerjammer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">im an alabama fan and there isnt two better teams than alabama and lsu. some ppl say that the game was boring but if actually pay attention to whats goin on instead of just following the ball u would have been amazed with the game. if they play anyone else in bowl games they will both win. with everyone else losing i dont see it shaping up any other way unless arkansas beats lsu. i think the two best teams should play for the nc. no matter if they win the conference or not. alabama shouldnt be punished just for being in the same conference (division) as lsu. </div></div>
Your opinion is all theoretical. I say the best two teams are OSU and VT. (not really, just for arguments sake) Why should Alabama get a second chance? You lost on your home field. If Alabama gets to play in the BCSCG then the first match up meant nothing.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Knife</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JCH</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why should you be eligible to win a National Championship if you didn't win your conference championship? </div></div>
It is simple if the two best teams in the country are in the same division. That is the whole purpose of the BCS is to get the best two teams in the country in the championship game. If Bama and LSU both win out then I think there is no doubt that they are the best two teams. OSU lost to Iowa, Oregon lost 2 games, OU lost 2 games. Bama's only lost was to LSU in OT, and that game could have went either way. What team do you think should be in there over Bama? Houston? Stanford? OSU? No other team is more deserving than Bama, just because some team plays in a weak conference doesn't give them a leg up over a really good team in a really strong conference and division. Until we get a playoff this is the best we have.</div></div>
again, all theoretical arguments. Bama had their chance on their home field and lost. It is someone else's turn, someone who wins their conference championship.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: halcyon575</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I agree but tell that to Oklahoma in 2003 and Nebraska in 2001. Both lost their conference championship yet made it out to the NCG. However there has not been a team to play for the NC that hasn't at least won their division....</div></div>
I agree 100%. In 2003 I argued against OU going. They didn't deserve it, they lost to K-State in the Big 12 Championship.
My point to all this is simple, you all are basing your fact on opinion. You have opinions that the SEC is the best conference. Most years you are right, but not all years.
Alabama had their chance AT HOME, and lost. Arkansas got blown out by Bama, LSU will play ARK this weekend.