Hello all,
I recently traded my early production SOCOM 16 for an M1A Loaded in an EBR chassis. I am now encountering the dilemma of what over-the-receiver rail i should use.
What I've heard so far:
-LaRue Tactical manufactured a diving board style cantilever rail that i have hear good things about, but from what i understand, they are currently fairly hard to put hands on.
-Sage Int. manufactures a 2 contact point cantilever style rail. I like the 2 contact points idea because i would think it would help with rigidity.
-A.R.M.S #18 Mount is the only non-Cantilever style mount i have looked at. Still has the three contact points, not sure if it is any better or worse.
what I am looking for is some knowledge from people with first hand experience with these rail systems to let me know there own opinions of Pros and Cons. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks all!
I recently traded my early production SOCOM 16 for an M1A Loaded in an EBR chassis. I am now encountering the dilemma of what over-the-receiver rail i should use.
What I've heard so far:
-LaRue Tactical manufactured a diving board style cantilever rail that i have hear good things about, but from what i understand, they are currently fairly hard to put hands on.
-Sage Int. manufactures a 2 contact point cantilever style rail. I like the 2 contact points idea because i would think it would help with rigidity.
-A.R.M.S #18 Mount is the only non-Cantilever style mount i have looked at. Still has the three contact points, not sure if it is any better or worse.
what I am looking for is some knowledge from people with first hand experience with these rail systems to let me know there own opinions of Pros and Cons. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks all!