Re: mil/moa to mil/mil: is it just the knobs?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Acttacus</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Axeman,
1. MOA/MIL and MIL/MIL are basically the same thing, just on a different scale thats all, learn how to use both, and learn the conversions.
2. 66MOA or 90MOA, matter of fact is the maximum adjustments you are ever going to need is not even a fraction of that. with a .308 you can accurately shoot 50yd to 1000yds without even having to touch the turrets. Plus on a $300 scope I wouldn't put too much faith in the accuracy and reliability of the turret adjustments any how.
3. Buy/load quality ammo, goto the range, zero at 200yds, chrono the gun, work out your ballistics, verify ballistics with actual shooting, and put in time honing your shooting techniques.
A few thousand rounds down the pipe and everything will fall into place.
My 2 cents.. </div></div>
i may not ever need to or get to shoot 1000 yards, but others on this site have said that with 90 moa, i would just barely have the elevation i needed to get to 1000 and may want to get a 20 moa base. id like to have the gun set up from the start and not have to change anything down the road and have to re-learn. if i read what you said, your suggestion is to not use the target knobs, but to just hold over for any range corrections using bullet drop data? i get the mil/moa, mil/mil aspect, i have been reading up on it, ill adapt to what i have. at this point i guess im just playing out the hand dealt me. i was sold a scope with 90 moa that only has 66 moa. either its broken or its a false claim, or my logic and math skills suck and i shouldnt be trying to do range finding math. i do appreciate the data, but oddly enough i just got a MDM for $12 from a member here. im not really sure what to make of the string of numbers you posted. i know what they are, that i get, but with no frame of reference, its kinda just numbers. i know you were trying to help by posting them and i thank you for your effort. ill call millett/bushnell in the AM and see what comes on the turn. if i had bought a scope that had 66 moa and i later found out i needed 90 moa, id say crap, its my fault. but to buy a scope that claims 90 and only has 66, thats a little different.