In regards to visible underwear, they forgot good lookin wimmin wearing thongs...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestWOW
The last thread got accidentally deleted while trying to clean-up some moron's inappropriate post. So, let's give this one a fighting chance:
- No naked crotch pics
- No Politics
- No religious stuff
how to make money on youtube
1- be a girl
2- post videos
3- charge to do naked shows
If you take the time and do the math it didn't happen that way. There is no doubt that the buffalo were over hunted, and that they may have been hunted out in some areas, but take into account that the buffalo heard was estimated to be 60 to 70 million try to imagine how many hunters, how much lead (400 gr per bullet), powder, wagons, and skinners to get into the most remote parts of the un-settled plains... it didn't happen that way.
There are accounts of pioneers in WY finding entire valleys covered in buffalo carcasses. The real problem was disease.
It turns out that the decline in the buffalo corresponds to the time of the first cattle drives to bring cattle from TX to WY. It if far more likely, and logical that disease wiped out the buffalo. When you do the math and take into account the short period of time that the decline happened.
Most records seem to show that the hunters were killing close to a million buffalo a yr. A million a yr in a heard of even 50 million? That would barely be noticible to the total, though it could remove the population in certain areas, like near the rail roads where it was easy to get the hides and meat back to market. The "hunt" ended in about 1884. Even at 2 million a yr from 1864 to 1884 that is only 40 million, now take into account the reproduction rate and add back at least 10 to 20 million and it's just not making sense.