-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
Reminds me of a local auto shop teacher that was killed (late 70's). Had a car up on four, yes four, bumper jacks. Can't make that shit up.
Should take some of that boob and put it in her ass. Improve both ends.
I assume this is a measurement of "brightness". No further questions, your honor.
A close friend of mine would travel around the country to attend certain events every year, and stayed in the same hotels. He would take his own lightbulbs because the (cheap) hotels he stayed at used the lowest power ones you could imagine.I assume this is a measurement of "brightness". No further questions, your honor.
Non-matching areolas and nips. Can’t have that. Kick her out of bed.
These days you have to specify 5 watt incandescent. 5 watt led is equivalent to 50 watt incandescent.I assume this is a measurement of "brightness". No further questions, your honor.
Hope this is a joke and we don’t have to explain light and shadows to a grown man
Just turn the light switch off, problem solved.Hope this is a joke and we don’t have to explain light and shadows to a grown man
I don't see the light messing with this one
Last edited:
Alright let’s explain light and shadow to multiple adults.Just turn the light switch off, problem solved.
I don't see the light messing with this one
Both of hers are in the shadow, other than a sliver of natural light on one that makes it look darker do to more shadow. The lady before that he’s talking about has a harsh man made light shining directly on one side and nothing on the other to create a large difference between light and shadow. They may not be perfectly the same color but without the harsh light they would be pretty much the same if not exactly the same. I guess her skins actually darker in the shadows as well lol
I’ve never done photography once but how light works isn’t wizardry.
Last edited:
I know this is a joke, but feel strangely compelled to answer.
The Case of the Unlike Areolae was due to lighting that was too constrasty for the camera’s sensor. In this case, it looks like the photog exposed for the shadows and therefore blew out the highlights.
Your eye has much more contrast range (aka dynamic range) than a camera, either film or digital.
With digital cameras, it’s better to expose for the highlights like we did in the old slide film days.
With negative film one tends to expose for the shadows, that way the print (equivalent to a finished product like a slide or digital pic) is exposed correctly.
Are you ghey? who the fuck cares?
I, evenly more strangely that I ever imagined, feel compelled to reply. If that were the case, the Case of the Unlike Areolae could have been fixed by reducing the white level in Photoshop
That said, it WAS a joke
Hey
Hey, let it go. I'm learning something for when I take pictures of the neighbor and I can't use a flash.
- Mar 15, 2018
- 1,279
- 5,090
