Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeSide note, he’s my cousin.
Found the link
Read this article years ago…some guys will get butt hurt
![]()
10 Classic American Muscle Cars Slower Than a Minivan
Very few of those original "muscle cars" are what you'd consider fastwww.thrillist.com
It's all about perspective. Compared to the cars of the day they were quick. It's like comparing a ww1 bi- plane to an f-16. Time marches on. Today's thrill is tomorrow's norm.From that link:
3. 1967 Camaro SS/RS
0-60mph: 8.0 seconds
Engine: 350 cid
Power: 295 hp
Transmission: Automatic
Tested by:Motor Trend
------------------------------------------------------
The '67 had a 327, IIRC.
I think the HP number is wrong for a '67 SS also. I'd need to do some searching. I have an old Hot Rod test of the '69 Z-28. They got it through the 1/4 mile a little over 14 seconds. I'd like to see a minivan top that. I had a '72 Z-28 that ran the quarter in the mid-14s stock, and the tires Chevy put on it were shit. With minor tuning and decent rubber (street tires, not slicks), it ran 12.7 at St. Louis International. But that's not fast. If you could get a Hemi Cuda to hook up, that was a decent street racer for its era.
The better comparison would be '60's and '70's muscle cars to recent performance cars. There's no comparison. There are quite a few recent-model street cars that run in the 10s and 11s with a solid driver. 9 second street cars are not unheard of.
Edit: The base SS was a 327 and there was a 350 option in '67.
If this is to me the article is referring to late model COPO cars that are 1000hp running sub 11 seconds.From that link:
3. 1967 Camaro SS/RS
0-60mph: 8.0 seconds
Engine: 350 cid
Power: 295 hp
Transmission: Automatic
Tested by:Motor Trend
------------------------------------------------------
The '67 had a 327, IIRC.
I think the HP number is wrong for a '67 SS also. I'd need to do some searching. I have an old Hot Rod test of the '69 Z-28. They got it through the 1/4 mile a little over 14 seconds. I'd like to see a minivan top that. I had a '72 Z-28 that ran the quarter in the mid-14s stock, and the tires Chevy put on it were shit. With minor tuning and decent rubber (street tires, not slicks), it ran 12.7 at St. Louis International. But that's not fast. If you could get a Hemi Cuda to hook up, that was a decent street racer for its era.
The better comparison would be '60's and '70's muscle cars to recent performance cars. There's no comparison. There are quite a few recent-model street cars that run in the 10s and 11s with a solid driver. 9 second street cars are not unheard of.
Edit: The base SS was a 327 and there was a 350 option in '67.
I think you’ll have better chances by sacrificing 30yo virgins at a stone alter on Mt Vesuvius.
Wow! Do they still make them that old?I think you’ll have better chances by sacrificing 30yo virgins at a stone alter on Mt Vesuvius.
Just wait until two Texas Rangers show up.
Damn bro, I thought you knew when you posted the pic.....gone on too long now...... DEFINITELY NSFWFuck off and find her name!
RLTW!Just wait until two Texas Rangers show up.
Rangers vs Muslims