Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

#78,251
1583404872859.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Titan85, Idaho-5R, Soulezoo and 16 others
#78,259
barneybdb said:
Looks more like the approach to 28 R at San Francisco than Vancouver, but I could be wrong, again....
Click to expand...
I was wondering about that. Does SFO have the piers with the ALS lights ? I've never paid close enough attention. Conversely, the pic is of a 47, so SFO would be a logical choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barneybdb
#78,261
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndamendfan and Barneybdb
#78,281
BullGear said:
It would be nice to see a picture of these women in another 20 years. Do these women not look at older men with their older tats? Do they see how a 30 year old tattoo looks?

Best of luck to them. They're going to need it.
Click to expand...

Well, as a big tattoo aficionado, I can tell you that; Most of the shitty +30 year old tattoos you have seen, did not look that great when they were new either. Tattoo skills, ink and needles has come a long way since then, and chances are that a good looking (well made) tattoo made recently will probably look pretty damn good even 30 years down the road. But in all honesty, no one really knows for sure, as tattoos today (the last 15-20 years or so) are made to a standard that has not been seen or done before. The skin it self will age, there is no way around that.
With all that said, some of the ink on the ladies above are obviously fake, and some are pretty shitty. But there are a lot of quality work too, by people that knows their shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, jrassy, Zorrosdens and 2 others
#78,283
Vargmat said:
Well, as a big tattoo aficionado, I can tell you that; Most of the shitty +30 year old tattoos you have seen, did not look that great when they were new either. Tattoo skills, ink and needles has come a long way since then, and chances are that a good looking (well made) tattoo made recently will probably look pretty damn good even 30 years down the road. But in all honesty, no one really knows for sure, as tattoos today (the last 15-20 years or so) are made to a standard that has not been seen or done before. The skin it self will age, but there is no way around that.
With all that said, some of the ink on the ladies above are obviously fake, and some are pretty shitty. But there are a lot of quality work too, by people that knows their shit.
Click to expand...

My daughter's long time boyfriend is an acclaimed tattoo artist and he will do just about any tattoo and he says he doubts these women will be happy with their tats in 30 years. The areas where they are getting some tattoos will sag and crape when they get into they early 50's. There's no doubting that. These women are living in the present and not the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, Zorrosdens and 1 other person
#78,284
BullGear said:
My daughter's long time boyfriend is an acclaimed tattoo artist and he will do just about any tattoo and he says he doubts these women will be happy with their tats in 30 years. The areas where they are getting some tattoos will sag and crape when they get into they early 50's. There's no doubting that. These women are living in the present and not the future.
Click to expand...

Yes, naturally the body and skin will age. But a quality tattoo is a quality tattoo. They will not look like the old sailors tattoos of times past. And what is wrong with living in the present? You say that like it is a bad thing!

I would say that 78291, 78292 and 78297 are quality work.
While 78293, 78294 and 78295 are pretty shitty, and 78310 is an obvious fake.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
#78,286
I have tattoos that are 30 years old. You have to look pretty close to see any fading.

All that being said....tattoos....no tattoos.....the pictures of 99% of these women has one effect on me. And that is, to appreciate the woman who has class and doesnt reduce herself to little more than spank bank material for whoever. Once in a while, a photo of a truely beautiful and classy woman is posted.....99% of the women pictures on here are cheap whores.

.....Not that i can’t appreciate a cheap whore.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Yasherka, j-huskey, tomcatmv and 2 others
#78,287
Vargmat said:
Well, as a big tattoo aficionado, I can tell you that; Most of the shitty +30 year old tattoos you have seen, did not look that great when they were new either. Tattoo skills, ink and needles has come a long way since then, and chances are that a good looking (well made) tattoo made recently will probably look pretty damn good even 30 years down the road. But in all honesty, no one really knows for sure, as tattoos today (the last 15-20 years or so) are made to a standard that has not been seen or done before. The skin it self will age, but there is no way around that.
With all that said, some of the ink on the ladies above are obviously fake, and some are pretty shitty. But there are a lot of quality work too, by people that knows their shit.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess the ink will distract some from the fact they're old and decrepit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barneybdb
#78,297
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lowlight
  • Locked
  • Sticky
2021 Sniper's Hide Forum Rules
Replies
0
Views
41K
Lowlight
Lowlight
Lowlight
All of Facebook's Banned Content in One Place
Replies
58
Views
18K
Ronws
Ronws
Lowlight
Forum Rules
Replies
9
Views
13K
MK75
M
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts