N Korea Threatens US & S Korea W/ Nuclear Strike
- Thread starter Silver_Bullet_00
- Start date
Re: N Korea Threatens US & S Korea W/ Nuclear Strike
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lonewolf‏</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Switchblade</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Man, you guys got it all wrong! You wanna really rock that pipsqueak mofo's world? How about a pair of battle groups inbound on each side. Light the little sac of shit up from each side as far north as possible. Sweep into NK from the highest point driving southward. Provide simple blocking action at SK's border. If both battle groups steam in from far out on the left and right of the peninsula then make a lightning insertion, the little pissant won't know what hit him. A simple sneaky prestrike on his headquarters will insure that leadership is nil and keep his head down if we miss the first time. Strikes in concert upon every large division will spin their heads round and also make them look upward toward china. By month's end, NK is no longer a threat, and the little commie bastard sabre rattler is a figment in a new history book </div></div>
It's a nice strategy as far as eliminating the north. But what's your POA with defending SK? They are going to turn SK into a glass farm.
Our goverment; especially the current administration is more interested in a democratic resolution than what our last good president would of done. He would of turned told NK that if you don't stand down yesterday; we are going to turn NK into the next playground for the south after we level it out for them.
This is what happens when you have a president with no military experience. He is more concerned with his next election than he is security of our nation.
Lw </div></div>
Defending SK isn't part of it. Taking out the ability of NK to further threaten anyone is. We have the tech to dump anything they launch out of the sky harmless, the ability to cease any and all commo they have blacking them out, and the ability to keep China out of the way. By forcing the first strike strategy from the very top border, NK will have to direct all southern facing forces north, or be taken like juicy girl on a Friday Pay Day Night. Theit only option would be to make a losing strike south or reface and try to stop the onslaught from north that will have them comletely crippled. At the point of their realization that they are totally and completely screwed they can either capitulate or die leaving SK to take over the entire peninsula thus killing Communism on China's southern border. I have had time to reread many of my favorite books in my collection and came to the conclusion that a dedicated first strike can fix the NK issue for good.
Using Sun Tzu and Sun Pin's ancient doctrine's to facilitate everything we desire is so simple in it's nature that it only leads to a winning proposition for the Korean peninsula. And yes, the DMZ sucks, and will always suck, but Area III does have some fun places to hang out
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lonewolf‏</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Switchblade</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Man, you guys got it all wrong! You wanna really rock that pipsqueak mofo's world? How about a pair of battle groups inbound on each side. Light the little sac of shit up from each side as far north as possible. Sweep into NK from the highest point driving southward. Provide simple blocking action at SK's border. If both battle groups steam in from far out on the left and right of the peninsula then make a lightning insertion, the little pissant won't know what hit him. A simple sneaky prestrike on his headquarters will insure that leadership is nil and keep his head down if we miss the first time. Strikes in concert upon every large division will spin their heads round and also make them look upward toward china. By month's end, NK is no longer a threat, and the little commie bastard sabre rattler is a figment in a new history book </div></div>
It's a nice strategy as far as eliminating the north. But what's your POA with defending SK? They are going to turn SK into a glass farm.
Our goverment; especially the current administration is more interested in a democratic resolution than what our last good president would of done. He would of turned told NK that if you don't stand down yesterday; we are going to turn NK into the next playground for the south after we level it out for them.
This is what happens when you have a president with no military experience. He is more concerned with his next election than he is security of our nation.
Lw </div></div>
Defending SK isn't part of it. Taking out the ability of NK to further threaten anyone is. We have the tech to dump anything they launch out of the sky harmless, the ability to cease any and all commo they have blacking them out, and the ability to keep China out of the way. By forcing the first strike strategy from the very top border, NK will have to direct all southern facing forces north, or be taken like juicy girl on a Friday Pay Day Night. Theit only option would be to make a losing strike south or reface and try to stop the onslaught from north that will have them comletely crippled. At the point of their realization that they are totally and completely screwed they can either capitulate or die leaving SK to take over the entire peninsula thus killing Communism on China's southern border. I have had time to reread many of my favorite books in my collection and came to the conclusion that a dedicated first strike can fix the NK issue for good.
Using Sun Tzu and Sun Pin's ancient doctrine's to facilitate everything we desire is so simple in it's nature that it only leads to a winning proposition for the Korean peninsula. And yes, the DMZ sucks, and will always suck, but Area III does have some fun places to hang out
Re: N Korea Threatens US & S Korea W/ Nuclear Strike
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lonewolf‏</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> .........our last good president </div></div>
Who would that be?
I'm with switch on this one. We need a war we can decisively win to eliminate the little jackoff and boost the economy again!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lonewolf‏</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> .........our last good president </div></div>
Who would that be?
I'm with switch on this one. We need a war we can decisively win to eliminate the little jackoff and boost the economy again!
Re: N Korea Threatens US & S Korea W/ Nuclear Strike
My Daughter's Godfather spent 15 months on that DMZ starting right after I got back from spending 13 months on the Vietnamese DMZ. He was stading guard on the 'Peace Bridge' (Sic...) when the <span style="font-style: italic">Mayguez</span> crew was repatriated...
Greg
My Daughter's Godfather spent 15 months on that DMZ starting right after I got back from spending 13 months on the Vietnamese DMZ. He was stading guard on the 'Peace Bridge' (Sic...) when the <span style="font-style: italic">Mayguez</span> crew was repatriated...
Greg
Re: N Korea Threatens US & S Korea W/ Nuclear Strike
Doesn't NK have a tunnel network just like Mexico and Palestine, making conmtainment like trying to step on an ant hive and hoping you got 'em all? That would make me think Switchblade is right. You can take out NK, but trying to do it in the name of defending SK is not possible. Since all our wars need to be "for the children", I don't see us stepping into this physically. Maybe we'll talk some smack, and push a new sanction?
Doesn't NK have a tunnel network just like Mexico and Palestine, making conmtainment like trying to step on an ant hive and hoping you got 'em all? That would make me think Switchblade is right. You can take out NK, but trying to do it in the name of defending SK is not possible. Since all our wars need to be "for the children", I don't see us stepping into this physically. Maybe we'll talk some smack, and push a new sanction?
Similar threads
