This is from one of the astronomy folks, but it does demonstrate what I've seen with many of the current Elbit stuff:
Photonis 4G vs Elbit Thin Film - Carpe Nocturnum
The Intens tubes tend to have low EBI/Halo (they are spec'ed to be that way), with a decent overall luminous gain, and usually a good Signal to Noise ratio. The center resolution can be in the 80s as well (as opposed to 72lp/mm)... though I think L3 may be or may have once just not put anything above 72lp/mm on the sheets or tested above it, etc.
I've been curious in that I've seen some Elbit tube with crazy high signal to noise (like 38-40), but also with pretty high EBI and over 1 on the halos.
This video more or less shows that.
L3 tubes, not so much... even the unfilmed ones.
Anyone know why Elbit is looking a little different than the ITT Pinnicle days of <=1 on EBI/Halo?
Photonis 4G vs Elbit Thin Film - Carpe Nocturnum
The Intens tubes tend to have low EBI/Halo (they are spec'ed to be that way), with a decent overall luminous gain, and usually a good Signal to Noise ratio. The center resolution can be in the 80s as well (as opposed to 72lp/mm)... though I think L3 may be or may have once just not put anything above 72lp/mm on the sheets or tested above it, etc.
I've been curious in that I've seen some Elbit tube with crazy high signal to noise (like 38-40), but also with pretty high EBI and over 1 on the halos.
This video more or less shows that.
L3 tubes, not so much... even the unfilmed ones.
Anyone know why Elbit is looking a little different than the ITT Pinnicle days of <=1 on EBI/Halo?
Last edited: