New Schmidt Bender?

seoi-nage

Private
Minuteman
Mar 3, 2013
3
0
North Texas

Attachments

  • IMG_1161.jpeg
    IMG_1161.jpeg
    116.4 KB · Views: 35
@koshkin ?

It’s FOV numbers are in degrees, which isn’t usually how they specify them to mere mortals.

I wonder if they did that to disguise the fact that they’ve uncorked this version for the US?
They have the FOV in m/100m and ft/100y on line 4 of the specs. It is the same for bothe the CMII and PMII

All the specs seem to be the same, except for weight: CMII 34.57g and PMII 33.16g
 
They have the FOV in m/100m and ft/100y on line 4 of the specs. It is the same for bothe the CMII and PMII

All the specs seem to be the same, except for weight: CMII 34.57g and PMII 33.16g
1745632233635.png

Weird. I thought I was losing my mind there for a sec lol. Basically, the specs change depending on the reticle you select. Above is the same base URL only with the M1FL or TR²ID reticles selected (2nd reticle from left and the last one on the right).

Below is what displays for the other two reticles, the GR²ID and P5FL. Notice the degrees change (line 4 above compared to line 5 below).
1745632830450.png
 
Interesting! I wonder why the FOV would be different between reticles.
I wonder if the 3.6°-0.6° spec is/was for the US…hmmm…and the dudes laying out the webpage are getting conflicting guidance from higher-ups.

Because if it was just a simple error of using the wrong (USA) spec, it’s curious as to why they also omitted the FOV row that lists ft and m. Of course it could be just yet another clerical error. 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited: