Re: New Weaver tactical 3-15x50
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: echo_foxtrot</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jrob300</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: toade</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hawk45</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I was out tonight with these same two scopes and have to agree with you on this. 12x on the SS matched about with 15x on the Weaver. I'd like to get a 3 optic to see which is truer to the magnification it should be. Be sweet if the 20x SS was really a 22x. </div></div>
Or.... would suck if the Weaver was really 12x Max. </div></div>
IIRC, the furthest I shot mine was 1000 yds., but one of my shooting partners has one on his 300WM and he said 1250 is challenging and the furthest he would try with it. he said that he just can't see very well out there. It is conceivable that it may be shortchanged on the upper magnification.
John </div></div>
John,
If this is truly the case, wouldn't that have been apparent when you did your side-by-side resolution comparisons and review among the Weaver versus the two Vipers? I thought the Weaver was already handicapped a bit as the Vipers were set at 16X and the Weaver maxed out at 15X. That is, if the Weaver is maxing out at an actual 12X or, say 13X, that must be some stellar glass to resolve the "4"/"-2" and "2" on the converging lines. Just curious now that I'm seriously considering the Weaver as well. </div></div>
"Apparent" only if you're looking for "that". We were looking for resolution, not apparent magnification. You're welcome to try this yourself, if you're so inclined. And yes, for the money, I'd say the Weaver has "stellar" glass. Welcome to the Hide.
John