New shooter here, prepping to enter into long(er) range shooting. I am using an AR15 platform, and I understand they are not considered precision shooting rigs, but it is what I have to get started and work on fundamentals. I also want to try my hand at this type of shooting a bit before I invest significant $ into a dedicated gun and caliber.
Right now the rifle is .223/556 16" 1:9 barrel with a 13" Troy Alpha free float, with grip-pod (bleh) and an inexpensive 6-24x40 scope. After trial and error working up a load I have it shooting 55g bulk reloads well. I was able to get Sub-MOA@50yrds with the grip-pod and shooting off shoulder on a bench. Needless to say I was impressed given the budget build, and knowing my limited skills, it also gave me the bug.

The next time I get out I will be shooting 100 & 200yrd.
I have a 24" 1:8twist upper for the gun coming from a family member to pu on my lower for middle range shooting. It has it's own handguards already and I am debating on swapping those out for the same type of handguards as my 16".
And that brings me to my question. My rudementary recollection of geometry and pivot points, I am thinking it makes sense and is more stable to have the bipod as far out on the "barrel" as possible? That way it provides finer control of your shot versus being 1/2 way down the barrel? However if that were true I would think you would see all sniper/precision rifles with the bipod all the way out at the muzzle? Is there a magic point/rule of thumb for that? My current setup is 13" guards on a 16" barrel, the bipod is about 12" mark. The new barrel being 24" I know I can get 15" handguards to let me mount the bipod @14". I am just not sure if that is worth doing, or just use the 13" I have, or do I go even longer if possible.
Current 16" build:

Most of my shooting would be 200yrd off a bench, but my club also opens up a 600yrd range once a month in the spring/summer. That from what I am told is all prone shooting and something I wish to do whenever possible.
Right now the rifle is .223/556 16" 1:9 barrel with a 13" Troy Alpha free float, with grip-pod (bleh) and an inexpensive 6-24x40 scope. After trial and error working up a load I have it shooting 55g bulk reloads well. I was able to get Sub-MOA@50yrds with the grip-pod and shooting off shoulder on a bench. Needless to say I was impressed given the budget build, and knowing my limited skills, it also gave me the bug.

The next time I get out I will be shooting 100 & 200yrd.
I have a 24" 1:8twist upper for the gun coming from a family member to pu on my lower for middle range shooting. It has it's own handguards already and I am debating on swapping those out for the same type of handguards as my 16".
And that brings me to my question. My rudementary recollection of geometry and pivot points, I am thinking it makes sense and is more stable to have the bipod as far out on the "barrel" as possible? That way it provides finer control of your shot versus being 1/2 way down the barrel? However if that were true I would think you would see all sniper/precision rifles with the bipod all the way out at the muzzle? Is there a magic point/rule of thumb for that? My current setup is 13" guards on a 16" barrel, the bipod is about 12" mark. The new barrel being 24" I know I can get 15" handguards to let me mount the bipod @14". I am just not sure if that is worth doing, or just use the 13" I have, or do I go even longer if possible.
Current 16" build:

Most of my shooting would be 200yrd off a bench, but my club also opens up a 600yrd range once a month in the spring/summer. That from what I am told is all prone shooting and something I wish to do whenever possible.
Last edited: