Nikon’s new Rangefinders

Airw4ves

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Oct 10, 2014
258
139
Canada
www.youtube.com
Monarch 3000 looks like a great offering for most of what we do, and the stabilizer is a nice feature. Looking forward to how these will perform out in the wild. Im looking to make my first rangefinder purchase so if this turns out to be a good offering it will make my short list.

What are your guys thoughts?

 
  • Like
Reactions: bman940


Thanks, but I'm interested in the black Rangex 4k
Screenshot_20180126-072737.jpg
 
I have send a message at nikon about more spec about rangex 4k...and this is the reply:

I have got consistent readings on trees at 3140. Nikon will understate and overperform

•Measurement range: 10-4,000 yd.* Maximum measurement distance •Reflective - 4,000 yards
•Tree - 1,700 yards
•Deer - 1,500 yards

•Accuracy: ±0.75m/yd. (shorter than 600m/yd.)±1.00m/yd. (600m/yd. and over, shorter than 1,000m/yd.)±1.50m/yd. (1,000m/yd. and over)
•Variable intensity, high visibility red OLED display–automatic or 5 selectable intensity levels
•HYPER READ–Quick and stable measurement response in approx. 0.3 seconds regardless of distance
•Fully multicoated optics
•ID (Incline/Decline) Technology–Horizontal Distance/Actual Distance display mode can be easily switched
•Tru-Target Priority–First Target–Distant Target
•8-second continuous measurement
•Waterproof and Fogproof

5-YEAR Warranty
 
Wow I am gonna wait on some more real world reviews from folks on here and such before deciding on going forward with my Leica 2700 purchase. Since I already use the kestrel and/or phone app for my solutions I could care less for all the fancy pants ballistics the rangefinder can tell me I just want a good strong rangefinder that can consistently range as far as 2k on steel targets and I can calculate the solutions from there. This could be why price is so much lower?? It’s a simply strong rangefinder without having to pay for the extra ballistic software that I wouldn’t be using anyways?
 
i will say the 3k seems more appealing for the stabilization feature. but if you are trying to hit something at 4k, you will probably be doing it supported anyway so thats not really a deal breaker. i like this but am watching the new vectronix very closely.
 
How useful is the stabilization feauture for those that have used other optics with that feauture? Was thinking of picking a sig kilo up but these Nikons are very interesting depending on release date.
 
One thing that realy bothers me with what ia have seen looking trough the Stabilised Nikon is a huge and thick reticle like its meant to range only close in targets , what is the point ?
 
Last edited:
I'm the guy in the video, I took 5th in the PRS in 2015 and I've used a mess of rangefinders. The 4k is a beast for the price, I've hit tress with with 4k at 3,180, consistently at 2,700. It's an incredible unit for the price. Beam divergence on the 4k is 1.8x.25mrad.
 
I'm the guy in the video, I took 5th in the PRS in 2015 and I've used a mess of rangefinders. The 4k is a beast for the price, I've hit tress with with 4k at 3,180, consistently at 2,700. It's an incredible unit for the price. Beam divergence on the 4k is 1.8x.25mrad.

Have you played with the stabilized 3000? Which is better between the two? Wondering if the stabilized 3000 might do better on animals and small target because it would be easier to keep the beam on the intended target.

John
 
I'm the guy in the video, I took 5th in the PRS in 2015 and I've used a mess of rangefinders. The 4k is a beast for the price, I've hit tress with with 4k at 3,180, consistently at 2,700. It's an incredible unit for the price. Beam divergence on the 4k is 1.8x.25mrad.
Where did you get the beam divergence information from. I literally just emailed Nikon about this, and they said "Thank you for contacting Nikon. At this time we do not have that information available.".

Not attacking you, just want to know the source, since I'm sure I was not the only one to email Nikon about this.