It can very well be the difference in class if going for a fully kitted comp gun and not a "real" hunting rig for NRLH and by the looks of the caliber choice thats what the OP is going for.
On average you save 1/2 a pound on the action if you go ultra light vs std steel. It matters if you want to run a heavier scope although there are more savings to be made on the Chassis/stock and Barrel thats for sure.
I went thru this exercise a few months ago except my goal was to have a sub 16 gun so i went with a std LP Fuzion. Saving weight on the action will "buy" you credits to "spend" somewhere else if you wanna get sub 12 is the way you have to look at it.
For example the weight savings of running your anti x are about as much as you need to offset the weight of a full length arca rail, a full sized steel break and collar vs a no break gun or maybe your bipod choice... There are not many quality scopes out there under 1.5 pounds (without mount) with a top end of 16x either so that's one area where you wont save much and if you are dead set on a specific scope you'll need the savings somewhere else.
If going for sub 16 it really is a wash, if going for sub 12 go light on everything funds allow.