Re: PC or Mac
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ArcticLight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Erik S.</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is alot of good information here in the form of opinions from many SH members!
get a Mac. Because the OS is open source
you can easily delete the entire program without having to go through an arduous uninstall procedure.
</div></div>
I support both OS's but lets be logical about this.
In the VERY near future, like 2 years ago LOL, the US Government started sending out IAVA's, or security alerts.
Now mind you these are the alerts that CAN affect what you do.
a few years ago Linux was the craze, but nobody ever saw the "Critical" security alerts on Linux, it was DOUBLE what Windows XP was. 32 to the 16 criticals of XP.
<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">Now I like MAC's, got no problem with them except the price and proprietary nature of the hardware.</span></span>
But before I left my job there were 4 critical IAVA's out for the MAC. This means, if you do not fix it you cannot run it on the network, because a hacker (See the open source piece you wrote above) has FOUND a flaw thanks to that open source code. (it's really not however as it's highly modified version of BSD Unix not Linux)..
But all the same, the bad guys are now turning their attention to macs and iphones because Apple has begun doing things like Microsoft did. Not as bad but it has begun.
MAC webserver - heard it's one of the best on the planet but not many people run it.
So just be fair about this.
<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">Oh yeah, last I checked, about 3 versions ago, MAC's used a registry. So while you can just "Delete" a program I have a very poewrful hunch it leaves a bunch of crap in the registry which can over time slow the OS down.</span></span>
<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">Also the HPFS file system they used ot use, got very fragmented, there is or should be a defrag tool that a lot of people don't run.</span></span>
I'm a bit outdated on the MAC and I do respect them but I just want ot be fair.
All in all, still say a mac is a better long term investment, although my last P4 was bought in 2002 so it lasted me 8 years without ever rebuilding XP.
Anyway you MAC gurus fill me in if I'm wrong - my info was pre-Unix.
FYI MAC runs the same or VERY similiar OS as what is flying around in orbit on 90% of the satellites and on the rovers on mars. They are currently running a 286 processor with BSD Unix.
</div></div>
1. Macs no longer use proprietary hardware and that is a shame IMO because the Power PC processors actually had a lot more performance in them. They were leaps and bounds ahead of Intel hardware at the time. Remember the first commercially available 64 bit machine was an Apple well before any PC was able to pull that feat off. The move to Intel was made to appease switchers.
2. OS X does not have anything close to a registry and thank God for that because the registry is where the bulk of Windows problems start popping up.
3. The HFS extended file system transparently defragments itself so there is no need for a disk defragmentation utility like there is with Windows.
While OS X is based on UNIX it is not an open system like BSD UNIX this is part of what makes OS X MORE secure than Windows or UNIX.