Agreed. And just to be clear (in case you meant me and not him), I didn't say they ruled "no fraud." They ruled the evidence was inadmissible, so as you say - the cases were never heard.
I gotcha and yeah I was talking about the crayon eater.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeAgreed. And just to be clear (in case you meant me and not him), I didn't say they ruled "no fraud." They ruled the evidence was inadmissible, so as you say - the cases were never heard.
We don’t have this. It existed for a few years and was called the Articles of Confederation. The constitution destroyed what you described and set in motion the inevitable rogue federal gov’t that exists today and which was warned about and documented at the time in the Anti-Federalist Papers. The well connected and powerful wanted to control the poor via a centralized and stronger federal gov’t which they got via the constitution. A revolution nearly took place as a result which ultimately led to the adoption of the bill of rights which wasn’t nearly enough to curtail what was surely to come.snip…
The reason we have a constitution with limited, enumerated powers is so that the outcome of an election does not result in tyranny.
snip….
You realize these judges were most likely paid off or are Democrats. If you can't see the ballot stuffing and pulling out of suitcases full of ballots.... Ballots being delivered and then a water main break happens....It's not fair of you to edit my messages to make it appear I said something I didn't say. Like the 60+ court cases across the state and federal spectrum that found no evidence of meaningful fraud ... I do not believe the election was "rigged". I do believe that a lot of people believe that, but I'm an "evidence" guy, and have seen none to indicate anything other than the accuracy of the certified results. I don't have to "like" the results of an election ... to accept them.
If you truly suggest the election was "rigged", and zero courts or election certification entities agree ... what are you proposing for the next election? Will it be "rigged" if Donald Trump wins, or only "rigged" if he loses? Were the 2022 elections that turned the House over to Republican control "rigged", or are they only rigged when the Democrats come out on top and they're free and fair when the right wins?
You're on a very slippery slope here.
There's an excellent book entitled "How Democracies Die" that really enlightened me on the lead-up to other failed democracies, what's going on in America right now, and why we should be so concerned by the comparisons. Highly recommended reading. Spoiler Alert: Declaring an election rigged because you lost, is a pretty common theme in the leadup to the death of a democracy.
You realize these judges were most likely paid off or are Democrats. If you can't see the ballot stuffing and pulling out of suitcases full of ballots.... Ballots being delivered and then a water main break happens....
Explain to me how back in the past we were able to get all the ballots counted in one night when we had basic technology of people counting but now we have computers that can't count all the ballots in one night......
Doc
“Put simply, judges wereThe plurality of cases were dismissed on standing not ruled on by the facts. SCOTUS did much the same. Put simply, judges were afraid.
Amazing, the number of people that have been deceived by the magicians.“Put simply, judges wereafraidcomplicit.”
Now you know.
Illegal drugs are easier to get and use
AMEN BROTHER ... killing the NFA and de-clawing the ATF is definitely on my wish list too. Nothing would thrill me more than paying for a suppressor, and walking out of the store with it the same day. It's ridiculously stupid that an accessory designed to protect my hearing, is treated like an illegal drug.
“Put simply, judges wereafraidcomplicit.”
Now you know.
Yeah, Steven Levitsky does not like Republicans, or their principles. He does not like the US Constitution or the system it set up for voting. He proposes something more akin to democracy than our constitutional system as a fix in Tyranny of The Majority.There's an excellent book entitled "How Democracies Die" that really enlightened me on the lead-up to other failed democracies, what's going on in America right now, and why we should be so concerned by the comparisons. Highly recommended reading. Spoiler Alert: Declaring an election rigged because you lost, is a pretty common theme in the leadup to the death of a democracy.
I bought into the bullshit at one time. I went from being too young to care to straight into believing the “magicians” or at least not questioning them. The Trump presidency ultimately led to my awakening. It’s frustrating and sad that many live and die in such ignorance. Those around me will not.Amazing, the number of people that have been deceived by the magicians.
The original system as you put it allowed for this mess by design. Read post. #1102 if you hadn’t already and read some of the anti-federalist papers for yourself. The system was set up from the start to serve the “elites” at the time. Washington himself supported Hamilton, the founder of the Federalist party, in his quest for a strong centralized gov’t. We’ve been fed and believe a lot of fairytales that is nothing more than propaganda.As I sit reading A Country Of Vast Designs, it is incredible how in the early nineteenth century folks were wringing their hands over corruption and conspiracies in political events with nasty mudslinging and attacks even back then. The press was unabashedly partisan, as well. Leaks. Secret deals. Bribes.
There is nothing new under the sun.
The system the Founders came up with is a better protection against tyranny than any other system of government in the world.
That does not mean it is perfect or infallible, but democracy has been tried, and it sucks, for numerous reasons. In fact, it can almost be said that democracy almost always leads to tyranny, and it can be hurried along any time there is an emergency.
I'd like to undo some other "democracy" we have worked into our system over the last couple hundred years and go back to the original. Maybe repeal all of the amendments after the Fifteenth.
I have read them, and I have also spent time analyzing the changes made to accommodate anti-federalist concerns, without which all of the states would not have ratified. I don't think your point is valid.The original system as you put it allowed for this mess by design. Read post. #1102 if you hadn’t already and read some of the anti-federalist papers for yourself. The system was set up from the start to serve the “elites” at the time. Washington himself supported Hamilton, the founder of the Federalist party, in his quest for a strong centralized gov’t. We’ve been fed and believe a lot of fairytales that is nothing more than propaganda.
Yes, I honestly think there are some within government that knew what was going on, even wanted to contest it but my assumption is that they were talked to, scared, coerced etc. and swayed their opinion for fear of what the “other” side would do. Seriously. They already seen the summer of love. And out of the two groups they knew the Republicans or conservatives wouldn’t do shit but you can bet your ass if they overturned the election that the other side would have caused complete chaos across the US, guaranteed! So in an effort to keep as much peace as possible, they let the fraud go on unabated. It was a calculated move.There was definitely both but the majority was fear. The complicit judges wanted the trials so they could give the facade of a ruling on the merits.
How did the changes end up working out? Whether you agree or not, my point is valid. The behemoth alive today is a result of the constitution everyone pretends to hold so dear.
The behemoth alive today is a result of the changes "progressives" championed to the constitution, which were adopted in the early twentieth century: income tax, popular election of Senators, enshrining the right of women to vote . . . that is, drastic changes to the original design, not the original design itself.
I can agree in part. Basically most everything before the ……The behemoth alive today is a result of the changes "progressives" championed to the constitution, which were adopted in the early twentieth century: income tax, popular election of Senators, enshrining the right of women to vote . . . that is, drastic changes to the original design, not the original design itself.