PISTOL BRACE
- Thread starter Conrad101st
- Start date
We don’t have this. It existed for a few years and was called the Articles of Confederation. The constitution destroyed what you described and set in motion the inevitable rogue federal gov’t that exists today and which was warned about and documented at the time in the Anti-Federalist Papers. The well connected and powerful wanted to control the poor via a centralized and stronger federal gov’t which they got via the constitution. A revolution nearly took place as a result which ultimately led to the adoption of the bill of rights which wasn’t nearly enough to curtail what was surely to come.
Read through these for some eye opening prophetic forewarnings of what will come if the constitution is ever adopted.
ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS
The Anti-Federalist Papers During the period from the drafting and proposal of the federal Constitution in September, 1787, to its ratification in 1789 there was an intense debate on ratification. […]
thefederalistpapers.org
You realize these judges were most likely paid off or are Democrats. If you can't see the ballot stuffing and pulling out of suitcases full of ballots.... Ballots being delivered and then a water main break happens....
Explain to me how back in the past we were able to get all the ballots counted in one night when we had basic technology of people counting but now we have computers that can't count all the ballots in one night......
Doc
The plurality of cases were dismissed on standing not ruled on by the facts. SCOTUS did much the same. Put simply, judges were afraid.
Amazing, the number of people that have been deceived by the magicians.
And here is the absolutely mind blowing irony, the UK, where you cant even own a semi auto bigger than a 22, or any kind of pistol that isnt rediculous, lets you buy them over the counter with nothing needed other than $$.
It is considered a courtesy to your neighbors and a safety device.
There was definitely both but the majority was fear. The complicit judges wanted the trials so they could give the facade of a ruling on the merits.
Yeah, Steven Levitsky does not like Republicans, or their principles. He does not like the US Constitution or the system it set up for voting. He proposes something more akin to democracy than our constitutional system as a fix in Tyranny of The Majority.
He writes well and can be persuasive, but ultimately Levitsky is an enemy to the Constitution and our system of governance. He basically wants a US where the majority gets its way.
The majority does not always get its way in the US by design. Levitsky thinks the Founders got it wrong. I think we, through amendments, have fucked with the Founder's design too much already, harming the system they set up.
I have not read How Democracies Die yet, but I am guessing it is full of more scare tactics to get folks to think the majority should always get their way.
That is not our system, and I hope it never becomes our system.
As I sit reading A Country Of Vast Designs, it is incredible how in the early nineteenth century folks were wringing their hands over corruption and conspiracies in political events with nasty mudslinging and attacks even back then. The press was unabashedly partisan, as well. Leaks. Secret deals. Bribes.
There is nothing new under the sun.
The system the Founders came up with is a better protection against tyranny than any other system of government in the world.
That does not mean it is perfect or infallible, but democracy has been tried, and it sucks, for numerous reasons. In fact, it can almost be said that democracy almost always leads to tyranny, and it can be hurried along any time there is an emergency.
I'd like to undo some other "democracy" we have worked into our system over the last couple hundred years and go back to the original. Maybe repeal all of the amendments after the Fifteenth.
There is nothing new under the sun.
The system the Founders came up with is a better protection against tyranny than any other system of government in the world.
That does not mean it is perfect or infallible, but democracy has been tried, and it sucks, for numerous reasons. In fact, it can almost be said that democracy almost always leads to tyranny, and it can be hurried along any time there is an emergency.
I'd like to undo some other "democracy" we have worked into our system over the last couple hundred years and go back to the original. Maybe repeal all of the amendments after the Fifteenth.
"to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States"
"General welfare" needs to be removed from federal tax.
Uniform - except when they redistribute wealth and control commercial entities through selective tax credits.
"General welfare" needs to be removed from federal tax.
Uniform - except when they redistribute wealth and control commercial entities through selective tax credits.
I bought into the bullshit at one time. I went from being too young to care to straight into believing the “magicians” or at least not questioning them. The Trump presidency ultimately led to my awakening. It’s frustrating and sad that many live and die in such ignorance. Those around me will not.
The original system as you put it allowed for this mess by design. Read post. #1102 if you hadn’t already and read some of the anti-federalist papers for yourself. The system was set up from the start to serve the “elites” at the time. Washington himself supported Hamilton, the founder of the Federalist party, in his quest for a strong centralized gov’t. We’ve been fed and believe a lot of fairytales that is nothing more than propaganda.
I have read them, and I have also spent time analyzing the changes made to accommodate anti-federalist concerns, without which all of the states would not have ratified. I don't think your point is valid.
Yes, I honestly think there are some within government that knew what was going on, even wanted to contest it but my assumption is that they were talked to, scared, coerced etc. and swayed their opinion for fear of what the “other” side would do. Seriously. They already seen the summer of love. And out of the two groups they knew the Republicans or conservatives wouldn’t do shit but you can bet your ass if they overturned the election that the other side would have caused complete chaos across the US, guaranteed! So in an effort to keep as much peace as possible, they let the fraud go on unabated. It was a calculated move.
I can agree in part. Basically most everything before the ……
Too many people before and just after the adoption of the constitution correctly and accurately warned about exactly what this country would be become. This cannot be overlooked and is no coincidence. Obviously the design was a valid concern then as it is now.
Similar threads
