Re: Pistol for Grizzly Bear Country
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lazlo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sean the Nailer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For the super-ninja in this thread, the first time a katana was suggested, I thought it was funny and a good bit of comedic relief.
But then you came back and repeated it, extolling its virtues. Now I'm scared.
Scared you are actually serious.</div></div>
</div></div>
Dude... Met this old-as-hell Inupiat Native guy about six months back at my Ranger Station. He was fishing outside of his village, and as he was cleaning the fish to bring em back, he got jumped by a polar bear from behind.
all he had was his freakin knife.
sure as hell, he jacked that bear until it was dead. He's missing half a hand, half a face, and an eye (thats all I could see)... but he's still alive.
Me, I don't carry pistols in the woods. nearly every rifle I have is capable of stopping a grizz, and since a 44Mag from a pistol has the same kinetic energy as a 30/30 from a rifle, I don't see the point of lugging it around, not that there's anything wrong with 30/30.
Usually, I have a Marlin 1894 in 44 Mag with 240 gr cast solids, or my 1895 in 45/70 with 525 grain cast bullets.
some places down by the Kenai river, that rifle won't leave my hands because of how close it is in the forest. But most of the places I go I've got plenty of standoff to make the transition from my flyrod to the slung rifle.
besides, bears are like big fat furry people with proximity issues- they've got better things to do than mess with you, and would rather go about their business unmolested. Just give em space and common courtesy. But always have a plan and a buddy.