All that talk about fair. 99 mph and they write you a ticket but 100 you go to jail?
Sounds fair.
Brain washed. Just as they like it
Gotta draw the line somewhere.
211 F water is really hot.
212 F water is boiling.
Is water brainwashed too?
P
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All that talk about fair. 99 mph and they write you a ticket but 100 you go to jail?
Sounds fair.
Brain washed. Just as they like it
Altitude might say different.Gotta draw the line somewhere.
211 F water is really hot.
212 F water is boiling.
Is water brainwashed too?
P
All that talk about fair. 99 mph and they write you a ticket but 100 you go to jail?
Sounds fair.
Brain washed. Just as they like it
Altitude might say different.
17 years, 364 days old....illegal.
24 hours later....free game for BFC!
So let me clear up some of my thoughts on this. I pay car insurance, not because I "have to.'' I do because I think it's a good idea and it covers me if I'm in a collision with personal injury or property damage. I don't have to worry about paying a debt to society. I've already been paying.
I don't drive 65 in a 30 or 35. Why? Because It's a congested area and I would not want to injure anyone trying to cross the road. It's not a law but is an ordinance. This is where I have the issue with said deputy ordering the bad perp out of the truck for an arrest. It is not legal. Dumb perp should have remained in the truck and received his fine/s. He'd be alive today, even though this low life of prior convictions, would be better off where he is. He demonstrated that with his handling the deputy. He should have let the unlawful arrest occur and sued afterwards.
Some have mentioned getting pulled over in speed traps. They are called traps for a reason. It's pure extorsion from people, who need to make a living to feed their families.
I do believe speed ordinances in populated areas are warranted. I don't believe it to be right for a peace officer to pull someone over for 5 over in a 30.
How about a simple flash of the lights and a hand motion of slow down with a wave. It's quite easy to find oneself going a bit over. Especially coming down a hill into said speed zone. If someone is traveling 5-10 over, and recklessly driving, let the fines ensue.
I am not okay with the cops who think they are enforcing law, when in fact are infringing on peoples rights with illegal arrests, warrantless searches and the like. This is where I state, know your rights and stand on them.
See my post #348I'll let you in on a secret. I have, on occasion, driving 90 mph, 95 mph, even up to 110 mph, [the fastest I recall ever driving was 111 mph], on bright clear days on rural interstates with few other people around, and I have never been ticketed. I also drove 110 mph + in Germany, but that is another matter.
I have never had a speeding ticket in my entire life, but I just admitted I have not only sped, but in some instances significantly exceeded the posted limits. My speeds were still safe for conditions and I was selective and discerning about where to drive at such speeds.
What about "98, 97, 96..."?? Is it that difficult to follow what I have previously stated?How about 98, 97, 96, 95, etc?
Arbitrary BS, who are you to draw that line?
The idiots in this thread have dragged it into the weeds regarding speed limits, marked units exceeding such limits, privileges vs. rights, etc.
None of this BS is anything but straw man obfuscation because it has nothing to do with the facts that lead to the dumb ass being shot.
Did he exceed the speed limit by passing a marked police unit at over 100 MPH? Officer says yes, dumb ass never disputed that.
Is the stop and arrest authorized by law? Yes it is. Fact. Whether or not you think it is fair or right has absolutely nothing to do with this incident. That's just you being argumentative because of your "feels."
Did the dumb ass fail to comply with the officer's orders? Yes, he failed to do as so ordered. Fact. Whether or not you "feel" the officer's orders or "tone" were acceptable to you, has nothing to do with the fact that he was within the law to do so.
Referencing the dumb asses previous incarceration as an "excuse" for his actions has absolutely no bearing upon his need to comply with the officer's instructions. Using that is no different than the liberal mindset who excuses anyone's criminal behavior by saying his actions are a result of his upbringing or his "social environment." One is responsible for one's actions, you can't blame it on the fact that you had no daddy in your household.
After being told he was under arrest did the dumb ass resist arrest? Yes, he did. Fact.
Did the dumb ass escalate his resistance to the point of trying to choke the officer and say "Yeah, bitch" while doing so? Yes he did. Fact.
Did the dumb ass get shot after the officer tried various non-lethal methods of force? Yes he did. Fact.
Go ahead and argue the facts until you are blue in the face, it still isn't going to change them no matter how strongly you "feel."
And I will bet my shoe size is larger than yours. 14 W. Yours is probably 9 M. Dainty as they are.Stay in your lane old man. You are showing your IQ and it's probably closer to your shoe size than you think.
That may be true but the “sovereign citizen” position has never won in court. Partly because it’s such an oddly disparate set of conjectures and partly because none of it is based in actual law.This is supposed to be a sovereign nation.
Destroyed by the reconstruction act of 1871.
The crux of what I have seen from sovcit's is that they can assume they operate under marine law. That we should still be under the AoC. And that the sheriff is the highest law in the land. Yet, they pull over whenever a cop lights them up.That may be true but the “sovereign citizen” position has never won in court. Partly because it’s such an oddly disparate set of conjectures and partly because none of it is based in actual law.
Having big feet somehow makes your low IQ score something to be proud of?And I will bet my shoe size is larger than yours. 14 W. Yours is probably 9 M. Dainty as they are.
They say the most common denominator of Sovereign Citizens is most are on meth.That may be true but the “sovereign citizen” position has never won in court. Partly because it’s such an oddly disparate set of conjectures and partly because none of it is based in actual law.
That may be true but the “sovereign citizen” position has never won in court. Partly because it’s such an oddly disparate set of conjectures and partly because none of it is based in actual law.
how many crossbow kills do you have?
do you work in concrete?
and 40% of cops abuse their wives...clean your own house before you go Paul Kersey on someone who doesnt want to register their car or whatever stupid shit they believe.
asskicking....lol
3 retards with a boot up their ass disagreeing with me is hardly an "asskicking" junior
wait....have you answered why police are arresting people for the same offenses they commit regularly? or are you still dodging that one?
That was already answered previously with the codified law that allows a cop to exceed the speed limit while on duty in pursuit of a suspect. You just don't want to accept that.asskicking....lol
3 retards with a boot up their ass disagreeing with me is hardly an "asskicking" junior
wait....have you answered why police are arresting people for the same offenses they commit regularly? or are you still dodging that one?
And you have only proven for the umpteenth time that you excel only at being capable of a sandbox tantrum. Probably you should wash your face and hands, like mommy and daddy told you to do. Dinner is ready.Having big feet somehow makes your low IQ score something to be proud of?
View attachment 8254223
Let me guess, you are named after Ronald McDonald?
You're a clown. Stay in the slow lane.
#BackTheBlueNoMatterWho, eh?
Police probably gotta speed home to beat their wives
I answered your question a while back btw....go look for it, I'm not posting it again
You bootlickers can go looking for it when you are done jerking off to your murdering citizens fantasies
Yes, obey and live, we all get that. Its preached over and over, to the point we pay 50% of taxes to govt, watch election interference, watch our rights squeeeeezed. Obey, obey, obey.....The idiots in this thread have dragged it into the weeds regarding speed limits, marked units exceeding such limits, privileges vs. rights, etc.
None of this BS is anything but straw man obfuscation because it has nothing to do with the facts that lead to the dumb ass being shot.
Did he exceed the speed limit by passing a marked police unit at over 100 MPH? Officer says yes, dumb ass never disputed that.
Is the stop and arrest authorized by law? Yes it is. Fact. Whether or not you think it is fair or right has absolutely nothing to do with this incident. That's just you being argumentative because of your "feels."
Did the dumb ass fail to comply with the officer's orders? Yes, he failed to do as so ordered. Fact. Whether or not you "feel" the officer's orders or "tone" were acceptable to you, has nothing to do with the fact that he was within the law to do so.
Referencing the dumb asses previous incarceration as an "excuse" for his actions has absolutely no bearing upon his need to comply with the officer's instructions. Using that is no different than the liberal mindset who excuses anyone's criminal behavior by saying his actions are a result of his upbringing or his "social environment." One is responsible for one's actions, you can't blame it on the fact that you had no daddy in your household.
After being told he was under arrest did the dumb ass resist arrest? Yes, he did. Fact.
Did the dumb ass escalate his resistance to the point of trying to choke the officer and say "Yeah, bitch" while doing so? Yes he did. Fact.
Did the dumb ass get shot after the officer tried various non-lethal methods of force? Yes he did. Fact.
Go ahead and argue the facts until you are blue in the face, it still isn't going to change them no matter how strongly you "feel."
I think the problem is, who started the hostilities, who finished the hostilities, and who will get to walk away? Can you do this in your job? Can a store clerk do this to protect the goods in their store?
That's the best you can do? I guess I shouldn't have expected more from a low IQ sasquatch. Or do you identify as a yeti?And you have only proven for the umpteenth time that you excel only at being capable of a sandbox tantrum. Probably you should wash your face and hands, like mommy and daddy told you to do. Dinner is ready.
Has nothing to do with this incident. Your beef is with the system.Yes, obey and live, we all get that. Its preached over and over, to the point we pay 50% of taxes to govt, watch election interference, watch our rights squeeeeezed. Obey, obey, obey.....
Nobody here is going to miss the guy! He was probably a douche maximus. I dont know, and I dont care! Guess who will be paying the lawsuit and/or attorney fees, ....WE!
I think the problem is, who started the hostilities, who finished the hostilities, and who will get to walk away? Can you do this in your job? Can a store clerk do this to protect the goods in their store?
Nobody cares about "feels"...its about right, wrong, and injustice. The govt has such an endless supply of your check, my check, we's check, that 95% of people have to take plea bargains or........obey, obey, obey! How much more "up the ass" should a people endure? Name the imaginary "line" for you. Trannies in your daughters sports isnt enough, killed for speeding isnt enough....what is it?
That's the best you can do? I guess I shouldn't have expected more from a low IQ sasquatch. Or do you identify as a yeti?
Pretty much. Kinda like a dog. You have a boxer, Shepard, Labrador and Chihuahua to name a few. So sasquatch, yeti, swamp ape and few others are probably just different breadsWait a minute…aren’t they the same thing?
P
Clue:Has nothing to do with this incident. Your beef is with the system.
Good for you.
Pretty much. Kinda like a dog. You have a boxer, Shepard, Labrador and Chihuahua to name a few. So sasquatch, yeti, swamp ape and few others are probably just different breads
And you as a participant existing within the system are also. So you are the system.Clue:
As one of the participants is employed by the system wouldn't he, in fact, be the system?
R
He thinks I am a chatbot. Or an FBI agent. Or some other made up nonsense. Completely clueless. Not worth have any dialogue with, just a silly weasel.I answered the question you asked me. I’m waiting for you to do the same. You’ve been dodging the questions, poorly. How many posts have you made after post 225?
You've had ample opportunity to answer the question.
Keep ignoring the question and take the L. It’s obvious.
P
You may be reaching a bit.And you as a participant existing within the system are also. So you are the system.
Be that as it may, this esoteric discussion about things bigger than the incident really has no bearing on the facts of the incident. It's just an effort to avoid the obvious which is pointed out to you in the thread title.
The system is unfair, oh boo hoo.
So is life.
Sorry about cancer.You may be reaching a bit.
I missed my 1099.
Life being not fair: cancer
I don't think i have to show examples of things under "control" that aren't fair.
One can be adjusted.
If there is desire...
R
Clearly you've reach a conclusion before asking a question.Sorry about cancer. How much are you going to blame "the system" for the dumb ass being ventilated or are his actions his to own? ("play stupid, win stupid).
Never said you did. The "you" pertains to those that have. Apparently I should have been more specific.Clearly you've reach a conclusion before asking a question.
I've never absolved dumb ass in any post in this thread.
By my count there were 2 now three.
Some people don't think implicit bias be like it is, but it do.
R
As I said I'm not going to indulge the retarded sovcit legal theories.I dont think his idea is moronic at all! I think you fought for his right to travel freely. I think its misunderstood, but definately not a "moronic" idea.
Do we really need LE to protect the streets we drive on? We didnt have these stringent traveling rules when we had horse and buggy.
If a guy runs a red light and t-bones you, what rule, policy, benefit, ability does LE provide in that? Think about what they actually cure and solve on the road? They provide the same protection as they do crime, drugs, rape, murder.....Notta! They file a report, so insurance pays, and not a lot more. They are solving nothing. People speed, people go through red lights, people do what they are gonna do. Only thing I see happen when LE pulls a person over is they cause a pinch point in traffic, or people die. It also allows them to start their violation games of your 4th amendment.
Well then.As I said I'm not going to indulge the retarded sovcit legal theories.
You guys are the ultimate expression of the phrase "shithouse lawyer"
Pharmseller beat me to it. Both, I have the advantage of dual citizenship. Now, if I could just start getting royalties of those coolers and travel mugs....That's the best you can do? I guess I shouldn't have expected more from a low IQ sasquatch. Or do you identify as a yeti?
9 pages of epic horseshit.
Oops, I posted again.![]()
Babbling idiot I've been called before.
For standing up to conVID and the fiat monetary system collapsing before us.
Speeding and reckless driving are traffic violations. Can you show me otherwise? I am listening and eager to learn. I am always learning.
Please enlighten me if I am wrong, instead of calling me an idiot. I'd like not to loose respect for you, which I do hold for many of your posts.
For the record, with the exception of trolls, glowies, and bots, I have never resorted to name calling of any member here. We can all have differences of opinion, and still remain united. Again, I always strive for unity ..... as dumb as I am.....
I bet that was you LOL